Comment Thanks I always forget about that (Score 2) 41
It wasn't really until this last couple of years that I really realized just how thorough and complete the media capture is.
There are no "main source(s) of the answer", so not easy at all. However, perhaps you could ask the AI how the answer was generated.
The human mind does not arrive at answers purely by applying previously learned answers, neither does generative AI. AI makes predictions based on COLLECTIVE previous experience, not with boolean comparisons to collections of "main sources". AI remembers no "main sources" at all, it can, however, predict what they were with remarkable accuracy when asked to do so. This is why people think AI is a fancy "search engine" when it is not. When an AI appears to reproduce copyrighted works, it is just accurately regenerating work it has seen before but not stored.
When an AI "learns", it associates an input with an output, then it compares the output with predicted output of a model, determines differences and uses those differences to modify the model, resulting in changes to potentially billions of model parameters. The original input is not remembered at all. An "answer" is then generated for an unrelated input by using those billions of parameters of the model, there are no sources other than the model.
Except that is false.
"AI would be unlikely to conquer a problem requiring any meaningful original thinking, even with help"
You have no reason to believe that, and I don't think it's true. The human brain does not work on magic, "original thinking" may be beyond us currently but there's no reason to think it will remain unsolved.
Correct, those in charge seek to turn us all into mulch, they view people as property that they haven't yet stolen. They seek to replace you, deny you an ability to earn a wage, take everything you own, enslave you and have you starve to death homeless, voteless, and without rights or healthcare. This is capitalism in its purest form, only with a few people capable of taking everything with the aid of machines that we collectively pay for. And they are in league with religious freaks that seek to bring about the end of the world.
The techniques being used have been known longer than we've been alive, they just haven't been possible on such a large scale. Now they are. The answers are also known, but we are fighting a global propaganda war that we are losing. Trump is just a shameful skid mark on the time line, he's an embarrassing consequence of the actions of the real enemy.
"This is what a lot of people get wrong about "AI""
What is "this"? And who gets it wrong?
"The AI itself isn't the special thing on its own."
Which AI is "the AI"? It's not one thing, but it is a "special thing on its own".
"...because then it wouldn't be a tool."
Is your brain a tool? Are workers a tool? What makes AGI not a tool? AGI is merely a nebulous goalpost. a talking point to get money.
"It's a search engine connected directly to your brain"
So is your brain. And different AI works differently. Transformer models are not really search engines, but they work like imperfect ones, just like human memory. Sadly, nothing else about the human brain is there.
"With a little creativity and an AI you would be astounded as to what's possible with careful use."
I don't thing anyone here "would be astounded". Everyone knows the upside, it's the lies, the grift and the dangers they are concerned about.
We all know modern AI is capable of cold, hard, sociopathic logic that will surpass humans, the problem is that intelligence is much more than that. AI has no values and a lot of work needed to harness it goes into preventing it from committing the most aggregious errors...unsuccessfully. The cool thing here is that there's an application that doesn't wire AI into a gas chamber or grant it launch codes. Solving hard, abstract problems has always been the area where it should excel, a little good news is nice for a change.
Sadly, AC, you're way behind here, take it to Tom's Hardware.
The time spent on any item of the agenda [of a finance committee] will be in inverse proportion to the sum involved. -- C.N. Parkinson