Most of those people don't care. If you see the world as "us against them," you don't really care how similar "them" is, as long as "us" is on top.
Tricking them into thinking they're on top while they're pushing themselves down is the true heart of religion.
the reason they went with EGR in the first place is because they don't want to deal with the logistics of supplying loco fleets with DEF. Using EGR and DEF would completely defeat the purpose.
It's fairly common for non-locomotive diesels to use both EGR and DEF. The locomotives are irrelevant to the discussion since it's about trucks. Pickups and OTR trucks will both commonly have both.
So far 2/2 of the comments I've come back to this morning have been irrelevant. I wonder if I can get a hat trick...
The OP was referring to an event in European history that has had important consequences lasting for centuries. Maybe you should do a little research on it and make another reply that addresses that event.
Why? That event is irrelevant to this specifically because the situation is so different, which their own comment points out. I especially appreciated that from them because it made it clear that they (and you) are not taking that into account.
Garbage regulations like IP create these behemoths. If you want freedom, stop regulating monopolies into existence.
These activities alone should disqualify a site from Section 230 protections.
Removing section 230 protections isn't the fix. Once you start opening that door there's no closing it. It absolutely will be done unfairly. Algorithmically displaying content has legitimate uses. The question is, how do you regulate only the harmful ones? I like seeing what I'm looking for, so I want algorithmic content, I just don't want the algorithms to be designed to make me feel bad.
DEF systems on heavy vehicles work, but they're fairly, well, heavy.
They aren't. There's a reservoir, a pump, and an injector, besides the SCR. But the SCR is already present, it's just a little different in systems with DEF.
Among other thing, they use electrical heat to get up to operating temperature.
That's for freezing conditions. There's a resistor in the reservoir, big whoop.
Then there's the issue of needing the fluid. For earthmoving equipment and railway locos, they'd rather not deal with that and have gone with complex EGR systems with liquid cooling instead.
Cooled EGR is not an either-or to DEF. You can have both.
Indeed, it's extremely laughable to think that Muslims are all Democrats, when they are part of a conservative faith. It's exactly like believing that evangelical Christians are all Democrats.
Unfortunately, most people aren't going to take the step to figure out that their conservatism is just like the conservatism of the people rejecting them.
Whether you like it or not, social media is the new public square.
We can and should regulate how the creators of social media networks take advantage of their positions of authority and control. There is absolutely, positively, and in every other way no reason why we can not or should not do that. There is no principle under which a hands-off approach makes sense.
If it is known that social media harms kids, then doesn't the state share some of the blame? Why is there no law?
The gears of justice grind slowly. This is by design. When you go fast, you break things. And also, no. The state didn't make them do it.
If it is not known (or only recently came to light), can you really blame the social media companies?
Yes, you could. But that's not the case. They know and have known. We've talked about that here a bunch. They willfully conduct psychological experiments on users and monitor the impact.
If the harmful effects were known to the companies and they kept it quiet, then you'd have a case, morally speaking.
That's why there's a case... no, wait, thousands of cases.
Facebook willfully psychologically manipulates people into vulnerable emotional states in order to increase engagement, they take advantage of that by knowingly spreading false information and have actually reduced the number of people they have working on reducing the false information and replaced them with automated systems which produce false positives which punish users who are conforming to their rules and standards, but seemingly do nothing to prevent actual violations.
NOx is solved with DEF. The problem is, DEF systems which don't suck aren't solved...
To get the full power out of InDesign takes a lot of learning, but it's still recognizable and comprehensible to someone who worked on Pagemaker on a classic mac. You do have to understand typesetting to understand how to use it, but if you don't, you also probably don't need it.
A thing that often gets missed is that a lot of Adobe's users are extremely non-technical. They did not learn how to use graphics software, or DTP software; they learned how to use Photoshop, or InDesign. My mother was not a stupid person, but she was basically allergic to technology, and yet she managed to transition from doing physical pasteup with hand-done separations to working on a Macintosh and using Illustrator and Pagemaker. (This was long ago enough that Aldus was still a thing, and the Macintosh was a IIci with 5MB and a 8*30 non-GC card to run the Mac Two-Page Mono display.) And while InDesign is not quite as easy to use as Aldus Pagemaker was, because it does more stuff now, it's still quite comprehensible. I've used it for some projects, and it was still easy enough.
Remind me what a weapons research and production facility has to do with nuclear power?
I'm not interested in that guy's comment, but the common connection is that most of these SMR designs require more highly enriched fuel, which means everything bad about them is magnified.
Rockets are awesome, they are probably our best means of getting rid of billionaires. Just send their ass[es] to Mars.
Statism creates billionaires.
There are no data that cannot be plotted on a straight line if the axis are chosen correctly.
