| Subject | Datestamp | Replies | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re:Just tried | ||||||
| Re:Cool | ||||||
| Re:Broken by design? | ||||||
| Re:Client credentials for how many ID providers? | ||||||
| Re:ID | ||||||
| Re: ID | ||||||
| Re: ID | ||||||
| Re:Show, don't tell. Less hype, more details. | ||||||
| attached to Tim Berners-Lee Announces Solid, an Open Source Project Which Would Aim To Decentralize the Web | ||||||
| Future possibilities by automated taxes | ||||||
| Re:Public Data | ||||||
| attached to Disaster Strikes Norwegian Government Web Portal | ||||||
| Re:What's the difference from regular SQL ? | ||||||
| Re:xml like xslt? | ||||||
| Performance issues | ||||||
| Re:Why emphasize the semantic web? | ||||||
| Re:It is really simple | ||||||
| Re:links from Kingsley Idehen | ||||||
| Re:Semantic Web Quite Important | ||||||
| Re:It is really simple | ||||||
| Re:The Semantic Web has been a reality for years n | ||||||
| It is really simple | ||||||
| attached to SPARQL Graduates to W3C Recommendation | ||||||
| Misconceptions and risk-aversion | ||||||
| Re:It will fail for other reasons too | ||||||
| There is a lot of work on this problem | ||||||
| Re:Reason #1 the Semantic Web will fail | ||||||
| attached to Why the Semantic Web Will Fail | ||||||
A good supervisor can step on your toes without messing up your shine.