It's stupid to prepare on day 1 for extended serving capacity without measuring the demand beforehand. If there's demand, the system can be scaled appropriately as and when it arises. The alternative of planning immediately for worldwide demand which may never show up is less efficient.

I'm just a little Amino Acid
doing my own thing,
dum de dum dum dum.

Tell me more! Can I subscribe to your old AI model instead?

You'd think that a university agricultural reference for the public would be in the top rankings when searching for a specific variety of vegetable, but apparently today, that's no longer the case.

Sadly, everyone likes an eggplant!

What causes the Chinese population to save more isn't lack of work. It's lack of people. The current demographics are such that families have elders who are cared for by too few numbers of children and grandchildren. This forces the latter to save more aggressively so as to afford their extended families living and medical expenses.

The universal rule of business is simple: if you want to sell your product in some nation/state, then you should follow the laws of the nation/state. It doesn't matter if every nation/state has different or even contradictory laws, you should follow each of them where required.

Marking a product according to some proprietary standard is not following the law, even if the intention is in the same ballpark.

You're making unsupported claims about Shakespeare which don't respond to the question. The question is: how much faster does a general purpose LLM algorithm converge to the works of Shakespeare relative to an infinite monkeys algorithm. I asked for rates of convergence.

"Infrastructure" is not always good. Sometimes, it it just bad. In those cases, giving away the infrastructure for free is just a way to dominate and prevent the world from getting something better instead.

Current AI infrastructure is a scientific dead end.

Stealing all that info is just for training purposes!

Granted, you'd expect a good tool to respect private data, but Grok is a GREAT tool, and great tools steal data!

Also: it's no different from when a human reads something and puts it in their brain forever! If you want SpaceX to erase the information, well maybe you should lobotomize your employees too?

Also: your information isn't that valuable anyhow, don't be so arrogant, it's no big deal.

Also: Let's get rid of copyrights, problem solved!

It doesn't matter in the bigger picture. By far the most important worry for coding agent users today should be supply chain attacks.

TL;DR "Remember how you were told to never blindly run bash scripts that you downloaded from the internet? Nobody told Claude".

Good for them. Free Speech is not worth the paper it's written on.

Sorry, but that is not a rate of convergence. \o/

FoR A MoMeNt I ThOUgHt IT wAS ThE DaAtH oF ThE sHIfT KeY!

That statement is content less. If you claim convergence to Shakespeare, then point out the actual rate of convergence. Some papers with actionable upper bounds would do.

Nice! How much investment return is that in dollar terms, specifically?

Remember the rule: you're either a profit center or a cost center. If you're a profit center, put up the cold hard cash numbers.