Comment Re:I agree and disagree. (Score 1) 82
Hey, MicroShit - never heard that one before! I'll have to start using it...
Except that "micro" means "small," and there's nothing small about the shit they produce... so MacroShit?
Hey, MicroShit - never heard that one before! I'll have to start using it...
Except that "micro" means "small," and there's nothing small about the shit they produce... so MacroShit?
Ok. The founding fathers didn't want the President of the United States to have ANY POWERS to make any decisions inside the country. The goal was for the President to merely be the administrative head to enforce laws Congress pass, and its only check on Congress was the veto power. The President also served as a Commander in Chief and had the power to sign treaties with foreign governments, but those powers were meant to be EXTREMELY limited, as they gave only Congress the power to declare war, and Congress was required to ratify any treaties with foreign governments.
If the President has the power to make ANY DECISIONS WHATSOEVER, instead of enforcing decisions those in congress have made, then it's not the role the founding fathers wanted.
They also wanted the executive to be very neutral. Many of them were against the concept of political parties, but that turned out to be inevitable. However, up until the 12th amendment, the vice-president was the runner up, whoever got the second-most votes by the electoral college. So, under that system, Hillary would have been Trump's VP his first term, and Harris would have been Trump's VP his second term. Because they wanted to ensure a check even within the executive, with someone with different views being the one to break ties in the senate.
This all changed when Congress started creating a lot of the 3+ letter agencies and gave them power to create regulations as if they were law... and those agencies report to the President. Executive Orders should never be law, and were only ever meant to be something that provides guidance on how to enforce certain existing laws. If we really wanted to go back to the way the Founding Fathers wanted it, those agencies would report to Congress and would work to produce things that Congress would have to enact as legislation. By creating all of those agencies, Congress abdicated its power to legislate to the Executive branch. Anything enacted as a regulation by the agency should be converted to legislation if we really wanted to get back to where we should be.
Trouble is, Congress refuses to do its job and likes to play games like Budget Brinksmanship instead. Remember, for members of Congress, job 1 is to get elected, and job 2 is to get re-elected. Anything for their constituents runs a distant third to those two.
This is all party neutral stuff. Both of them do it. Both of them make back room deals to keep themselves in power and screw us all, and woe be unto anyone who attempts to disrupt that ruling class of people who know better than all of us peons.
IMHO, the greatest Soviet achievement in space was the Venera program, which managed to gather and transmit data from the harshest rocky environment in the Solar System by a large margin.
And it inspired a two-part episode of "The Six Million Dollar Man"... Death Probe
This is just bullshit to pacify the naysayers.
There's no way they'll turn around and pull features that they just launched and marketed.
They will if they want to keep the money rolling in from corporate site licenses, especially if those sites are doing government contracting or deal with PII, PHI, or other sensitive information like that.
I feel bad for the people who are turning AI into a crutch. When the floor falls out on all of this they'll realize that they robbed themselves of years of opportunity to develop their skill set. I hope they've got a jump to conclusions mat, or some other million dollar idea in store or they're going to find themselves up that proverbial creek.
People using AI as a crutch will never do anything other than get themselves into trouble eventually if they don't know how to spot check results. If something AI responds with seems off, there's a good chance it is. Want to use AI to do menial tasks like "create an array where each entry is the name of regular file found in a specified directory" because you don't want to remember the language syntax of every scripting language available is fine. It also does an excellent job of taking large documents and providing summaries. But asking it to do "research" for you? You'll end up getting in hot water because it could generate false results. Always verify.
It’s allegedly possible:
Yeah, I've seen the various videos and instructions, but the trouble is that it makes certain other applications fail such as the Microsoft Store, the search bar in the start menu... so if you can live without those, you'll be fine. On the plus side, it removes Bing searches.
If I were designing a university CS program, I would have my students program every day (every weekday). Just a 10 or 15 minute assignment each day, but do something. Over a four year degree, they'll have written a lot of code.
Make the stuff they write start to interconnect as the semester progresses too. It will help them learn a lot more about how to make reusable code, common libraries, etc.
Social media has a fundamental problem: it spreads misinformation much more easily than evidence-based facts.
Gatekeeping has a fundamental problem: we don't trust the gatekeepers. But it drastically reduces misinformation spread.
The only nit to pick here is that while gatekeepers might reduce misinformation spread, it is more about who's paying the gatekeepers and how misinformation is defined. It's more accurate to say that gatekeepers drastically reduce misinformation spread based on how misinformation is defined for them by their bosses, whether those bosses be a government entity, an interested corporation, or some other special interest group.
... everyone who has an account there went in and disallowed use of their accounts for this. But as others have noted, it's Microsoft... so who knows if they will actually honor it or not.
Opting out is relatively easy compared with overly complex social networking settings we’ve become accustomed to. ‘Data for Generative AI Improvement’ is found within ‘How LinkedIn uses your data’ under the ‘Data privacy’ section of Settings.
"Everybody is talking about the weather but nobody does anything about it." -- Mark Twain