Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment An old, yet still apropos quote... (Score 1) 174

"Nobody should ever need more than 640k of RAM."

Once everyone found it easier to just add more memory, the idea of efficiency started to go away... knowing the more efficient way to divide by 2, knowing how to avoid unnecessary program pointer jumps (if the first character of the string does not match, why run strncmp() for when you have a large data set)... these are things taught by experience. One of the best efficiency teachers would be to write for an embedded system with very limited memory. You learn very quickly about memory management and operational efficiency.

Comment Re:Something fundamentally wrong (Score 1) 277

The correct solution would be to simplify/rationalize the tax code, but we all know that is not going to happen.

That's because tax prep is a cottage industry. Intuit, H&R Block, and lots of others want us to have ultra-complex tax codes so they can continue to sell their solutions... which means they're making contributions to the Appropriations Committees and Subcommittees, and anyone else who could influence what's in that tax code.

Of course, if you really want to cause a taxpayer revolt, end the process of income tax withholding. Let everyone get their full paychecks without any money held back for taxes and force them to write a check every month. It won't take long before people demand better budget accountability.

Comment It may ultimately only be symbolic, but... (Score 1) 38

... not only have I turned off "Apple Intelligence" on any devices, I have also gone through every last detail to tell it not to learn from any apps on it and not to include it in any recommendations. It ultimately comes down to whether or not Apple and its iOS flavors will actually respect the user settings or not. At least by having turned off those switches it would give me a small amount of legal standing against Apple for violating user preferences/settings... not that I would do that kind of fight on my own, and it would also likely turn into a class action suit anyway.

Comment Nope... not doing it (Score 2) 95

It then becomes another subscription that you keep paying for all the time because you forget about it once it starts. I don't want to keep shelling out the cash for something I don't use frequently, because when you terminate that subscription your license downgrades (at best) such that you cannot fully edit your files any more, or gets shut off (at worst) so that you cannot even open the files. Better to pay the flat fee one time, get the "permanent" license, and not have to keep paying for something I barely use.

Comment It will always be "Lookout" rather than "Outlook" (Score 1) 64

Office 97? Those were the days when Microsoft blatantly ignored MIME formatted email, choosing instead to try to decode the binary parts itself... and that's how corporate computers got infected with some sort of email virus... because by starting that decode it auto-ran stuff. All they had to do was follow the standards and read the MIME header. If it were up to me, I would ditch it entirely and let people "bring your own client," even if it means some corporate IT types would have to evaluate different ones to add them to the "allowed" list. Unfortunately with this "Microsoft 365" crap, it's offloading the hosting of stuff like this to MS.

Comment Old school... "Windows NT is C2 Secure!" (Score 3, Insightful) 28

For the old school folks who remember how Microsoft was touting Windows NT 3.5 as "C2 Secure," we also remember the full statement was, "Windows NT 3.5 is C2 Secure as long as you do not connect it to a network." Looks like the same thing... that unless you can keep your AI stuff on standalone systems that cannot be accessed from anything outside of your local network it cannot be secured.

Or we can think of Little Bobby Tables...

Comment Re:BASIC (Score 1) 175

Which is why they should first be taught in C. Fundamentals is important.

I remember having to learn Pascal first. It was never a widely used language outside of academia, but it did force you to use some good practices with regards to data typing, structures, and algorithms. Once you learned that, then the next one you did was C. With the advent of better compilers, the need to learn Pascal has pretty much been deprecated as much as the language itself.

Comment Re:Senate (Score 2) 111

"members of the public to contact their Senators."

It might help if we knew who our senators were. We've just had an election, and the results haven't been certified yet.

Senators elected in November, 2024, will not be sworn in and seated until January 3, 2025. For now, contact the one who was not up for election or the one who ran for reelection, whether that person won or lost the bid.

Comment Re:One can only hope. (Score 2) 138

The use of "literally" to mean "figuratively" still bugs me, but I suspect we're going to have to live with it, it's part of the language now.

And then there's the complete misunderstanding of the apostrophe:

  • It's not "would of" it is "would've"... a contraction of "would have" (applies to could and should as well)
  • Apostrophes do not make plurals: the plural of "book" is "books," not "book's"
  • "It" and "who" are the only ones I know of where the situation is reversed... apostrophe for contraction ("it is" => "it's" and "who is" => "who's"), but no apostrophe for possessive ("its" and "whose")

Comment Re:Star Wars Films = Doomed Since TLJ (Score 1) 178

And the problems with The Last Jedi were the kind that damaged the brand as a whole (because they signal the intent of decision makers at the top): deliberately antagonizing the core fanbase, openly going out of its way to hold the OT in contempt, prioritizing a political agenda over the quality of the story and characters, and wasting the rare (and now lost) opportunity to reunite the OT cast to properly say goodbye.

This is a problem overall and has been experienced in other franchises as well *cough*Doctor Who*cough*. The producers, show runners, etc, have been far more concerned with trying to satisfy a small segment of fans and push some agenda or message, all the while forgetting that they have to actually tell a good story too. Sci-fi stuff always waxes political... doesn't matter what you support or despise. If the story is good, people will watch or read it and keep coming back, and it will likely attract new fans too... even if you are pushing an agenda or message. If you're going to beat your audience over the head with said agenda or message every few minutes, lines, or whatever, they will get tired of it and walk away.

There's no reason for fans to think any of this has improved, even after five years of Disney being afraid to release another film.

That's because the House of the Mouse has been pooping on other franchises, hoping the audiences will forget about the first round of mouse poop on the Star Wars franchise while they work on the current victim(s).

Slashdot Top Deals

Almost anything derogatory you could say about today's software design would be accurate. -- K.E. Iverson

Working...