I mean in general. They still exist in other products.
I mean in general. They still exist in other products.
Non-techies often giggle when I use the word "dongle". Can't we find a better word before HR hauls me in for alleged harassment?
You would think Seattle, WA (home of Microsoft, etc) would have a virtual cornucopia (sp) of broadband options??
Microsoft isn't in Seattle, it's in Redmond. Seattle might as well be Forks as far as MS is concerned.
From what I've read about the situation, it's only Seattle that has such horrible internet service. All the other cities there are fine: Redmond, Tacoma, etc.
Agree re: general utility of Siri, but how about "Hey Siri google x y z" or "hey Siri YouTube x y z"?
Most people bitch about their cell phone battery life but that hasn't led to Apple doing anything but making their phones thinner and their batteries smaller.
Well WTF do they expect? If they bitch and complain, and then run out and pay top dollar anyway for a device they bitch and complain about, why would the vendor bother listening to their complaints?
GN7? Hint: "recall'
The power and sophistication of say pattern matching can span a wide continuous range. For the high-end techniques, most are okay with calling them "AI". The medium and low end will invite more debate.
That marketers throw around "AI" a bit much, I agree. Whether its a misuse for this particular gizmo depends on how its done and how well its done.
I swear to god Apple is like a "stupid" tax.
Not exactly. Taxes are involuntary: you're required to pay them whether you want to or not. No one is forcing anyone to buy an Apple. People do this entirely willingly, just like they happily and willingly buy or pay for things like cable TV (including premium sports channels), church tithes, horrifically expensive handbags or designer clothes like from Coach or Gucci, Jeeps, or Harley-Davidson motorcycles.
I don't know about where you live, but where I live (a more rural area about an hour from DC), Verizon is king, as it is in most rural areas I know of. Verizon has, hands-down, the best cellular coverage in rural areas. Of course, they also have the very worst service, and the most astronomical prices. But people in rural areas happily pay it because they're unwilling to put up with less-than-stellar coverage from the other telcos.
Personally, I have a Sprint phone with Ting and it works well enough. I'm not willing to pay $150/month more just for better coverage. Sprint's service is "good enough", and doesn't cause me any problems.
While I mostly agree with you, your points about not having any cache among millennials and being a vaguely recognizable name from the past can also be said about Cadillac, which everyone has long been predicting demise for because it's an "old person's car". They were saying this 2 decades ago about Cadillac and Lincoln. Yet those brands are still there, somehow. Cadillac even survived the whole GM collapse, while Pontiac and Saturn did not. Now, how Cadillac manages to stay afloat, I have no idea, but they do. It's just like AOL and Yahoo; I have no idea how they survive, but they do. There must be someone out there still giving them money. And if Yahoo is anything like Cadillac, they could still be hanging around 20 years from now, though people will still be wondering how.
Advertisers want young people with disposable income for the most part.
Young people tend to either be flat broke, or rather savvy to attempts to rip them off, especially internet advertising. Young people are far more likely to use ad-blockers. Old people are not; they're more trusting and easily taken advantage of. That's why they even have laws designed to protect against "elder abuse". Advertisers would do much better targeting the old folks who use Yahoo Mail.
That's why it's better to live alone. My cats don't expect too much, though they can be a little bit distracting when they insist on jumping in my lap. Much better than having a live-in partner who's always whining about having too much housework to do and never has any free time and wants me to do all kinds of house-related stuff and chores, yet somehow when I'm on my own I don't have much trouble keeping up with the laundry and dishes and it takes me a tiny fraction of the time it seemed to take her.
I'd like to add to this that one good solution to this (for office workers who spend all their time on a computer) is to allow more tele-working. Encourage or allow employees to spend X days a week working from home. Then sick workers can get work done from home while not spreading their sickness, and healthy workers who never get sick can also work from home some and not feel like the sickly people are getting to do less work (leaving the healthy people to do it) as a reward for not being as healthy, and enjoy being able to work from home and stay out of the noisy open office too.
The problem with sick days (separate from vacation days) is that if you're the kind of person who never or rarely gets sick, then you're effectively penalized compared to someone who does, or compared to someone who lies. So places with sick days frequently have employees who lie about being sick so they can use up those days.
Otherwise, how is it fair that you should have to come to work every day because you're healthy, while Sick Sue gets to stay home a lot, and then you have to cover for Sue while she relaxes at home?
I came, I saw, I deleted all your files.