Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:We built DST changes into the hardware (Score 1) 150

If said device implemented any sort of updates for its DST stuff, then it would also accept an update for any new stuff. If it didn't, then it's already shit out of luck.

The actual timer/clock hardware typically does not. All there is is an on/off. And as pointed out, these tend not to be user configurable.

(NOTE: I'm assuming you meant, "The actual timer/clock hardware typically does not (implement any sort of updates for its DST stuff)" - you were replying to two sentences with opposing takes.)

Then the device to which you refer is already DST dysfunctional. Additional modifications to DST won't make it any less functional.

Your statement that, "Generations of electronics needs to be replaced first," is simply wrong. Such devices fall into three categories:
1. Supports updates to the schedule and offsets. These will keep working.
2. Lacks support for such updates, but has manual override options such that you can keep it working. These will keep working as well as they do today.
3. Lacks support for such updates and have no reasonable ability to correct it. These are already fucked and will continue to be fucked.

Nothing needs to be replaced BEFORE additional changes are made - whether that's DST all year, standard time all year, new DST change dates, new DST change amounts (1/2hr instead of 60min), or going full UTC.

The Olson DB will need updates, as it often does, and everything else will work itself out.

Comment Re:Ignoring the hysteria... (Score 1) 46

IMNSHO, something like this could be useful for IoT devices and similar systems. One often doesn't want a full OS on them, or SSH access, or the overhead of a package management system on the device, etc.. But will this bring any significant improvements over their existing update methods? From what I've seen of those random devices, there's certainly room for improvement.

The other area I could see this being useful is in VM[^1] deployment, especially with orchestrated systems that spin up and down VM's left and right. Again, that's not to imply there aren't existing ways to manage this, but they'll probably be able to sell some big customers on it (ex. what about Microsoft themselves licensing it for use in Azure?).

For normal users, and for those who actually want to own their device and what's on it, other solutions are better suited to those needs.

[^1] "VM" here could be expanded to cover a lot of similar technologies.

Comment Re:Not just americans (Score 1) 150

If that were true, there would not be a bill sitting on the desk of someone in the Senate that refuses to bring it to the floor for a vote. It passed the House already. So clearly quite a few people want to stop changing the clocks as well.

100%. And furthermore, we already demonstrated that the US is capable of making significant changes to the DST rules without people really giving a shit - Energy Policy Act of 2005 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

As backasswards as it would be, maybe they could just keep shifting the start and ends dates closer and closer together until the time change goes away entirely?

Comment Re: Not just americans (Score 1) 150

The problem isnâ(TM)t (automatically) adjusting clocks. Itâ(TM)s shutting our factories down in the middle of the night for an hour each year to guarantee no double timestamps in the database.

Why TF are you recording timestamps in localtime?

Record timestamps in UTC datetimes, or as a Unix Timestamp, or some of the other similar systems. And fire whomever it was that used localtime for database timestamps!

Comment Re:We built DST changes into the hardware (Score 1) 150

Don't care. Get rid of any such devices. They aren't so important that they can't be replaced.

That's what I said: "Generations of electronics needs to be replaced first."

Bullshit. For any such device, it already needs to be replaced (and/or its DST functionality is broken and must be worked around manually already). The DST schedules have changed several times just in the US, and they change constantly on a global scale.

If said device implemented any sort of updates for its DST stuff, then it would also accept an update for any new stuff. If it didn't, then it's already shit out of luck.

Comment Re: vi is the best editor - kludge for DVORAK (Score 1) 101

If and only if you can touch type

And use QWERTY or QWERTY-like. HJKL cursor navigation doesn't quite work the same on DVORAK or other layouts.

...

HJKL navigation is not QWERTY-dependent, it works just fine on Dvorak-layout keyboards, although key placement/layout is a bit non-sensical, but "h" Dvorak moves the cursor exactly the same way "h" does on QWERTY.

Is that not what the GP said? Look at the context of, "If and only if you can touch type." IE: with fingers on home row, HJKL cursor navigation causes the keys to placed where QWERTY would have them on JXCO, which is pretty awful to use in practice. IMO, and as a long time vim user, I'd want to remap all the vim commands such that most, if not all, remained in the same position they were in while using a QWERTY layout.

FYI, it turns out that is very easy to do in vim! The following will allow one to type in insert mode under DVORAK while keeping all normal mode commands under QWERTY:

" Restores QWERTY positions exclusively in Normal/Visual modes
set langmap='q,q',wj,ek,rx,ty,yu,ui,io,op,as,sd,df,fg,gh,hj,jk,kl,l_,,x.,.p,p_,,fg,gc,cr,rl,la,ao,oe,eu,ui,id,dt,tn,ns,sh,h_,,;z,qx,jc,kv,xb,bn,mm,m_

TIMTOWTDI, there's also a Dvorak plugin for vim. Just run:

:packadd dvorak

... then toggle DVORAK mappings with ",d", turn them off with ",q".

Comment Re:Strange bedfellows (Score 1) 55

If there is a story about New York, people don't start chanting "Jews in dreadlocks!" If there is a story about Pennsylvania, people don't start chanting "Buggies and Bonnets!"

Percentage of population of area:
* Mormons in Utah: 42%
* Catholic in USA: 20%
* Jewish in NYC: 12%
* Amish in PA: 0.74%

Comment Re:uh.. (Score 1) 20

Why do all the smart/ar glasses do the glasses part poorly? for devices you want to see none of them do prescription lenses if they display anything

YMMV on the how well they do it, but both the Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest 2&3 support prescription optical inserts, and XReal also supports prescription lenses (https://us.shop.xreal.com/products/xreal-one-pro-prescription-lens), and that includes this new XReal Aura (https://us.shop.xreal.com/products/xreal-aura ... it's listed on there under "Personalized Prescription Lenses").

Comment Re:It's about the size of some big Phablet phones (Score 1) 25

The iPad does not have cellphone chips so using it as an iPhone is simply not possible.

Don't be daft. People used iPod's as a phone with WiFi calling (ex. Google Voice). It's certainly possible.

Not sure why you think Apple is trying to screw you over if you cannot use it as a cellphone when it is not a cellphone.

Not only can it be used as a phone via WiFi, but they _DO_ offer a model with WiFi + Cellular. And yes, they gimp it - can't use it directly to make calls.

Comment Re:Don't understand (Score 1) 37

One is a registered company with known people working there, and the other is entirely anonymous. If forced to choose to which of them I would hand the same amount of money, I'd pick the one I could later identify if things go south, wouldn't you?

Now, $8k versus $150k? I don't know. And what about other options? But if everything was otherwise equal and you had to pick between one of those two options, why would you pick the person who already wronged you?

Comment Re: VRBO (Score 1) 132

I agree with you but there are different types of travelers. I'm still trying to figure out where I want to retire, so local stays make sense. But not everyone wants to experience a location as a local does, some people just want everything taken care of with 0 effort on their part.

And I have no problem with any of this. I didn't disparage hotels or those who choose them over an AirBnB. While I generally prefer travel that embeds me in local culture, now and then I love a good all inclusive resort. A variety of different options is great for everyone, but the GP and many others on this thread are so close minded they can't imagine someone wanting anything other than the same cookie cutter experience they want every damned time.

To make matters worse, it seems the biggest complaint about AirBnB seems to be that management groups and hotel groups have bought into it and made things shit. Those are the same groups that make a lot of hotel stays shit too. Abandoning all BnBs is the opposite of the right answer to that; Support small businesses and BnBs!

Comment Re: VRBO (Score 1) 132

... hotels are almost always a better experience than an AirBnB ... Why stay at a sketchy house that makes you clean, when you can stay at a hotel that cleans for you?

Have you actually stayed at many AirBnB's? Doesn't sound like it. IMO, it's like a real vacation then. An actual house in the area you want to be in. You can pick amenities that matter to you - maybe a pool, or option to bring your dog, or nearby access to hiking trails, or lake access, etc.. TBH, the shittiest AirBnB I've stayed at was still as good or better than the Hotel options in the area. The one area where Hotels have a huge advantage is consistency - if you want to blindly pick a place to crash for the night, you can assume a $BRAND_NAME_HERE will be on par with your past experiences in other places.

Comment Re:Of course that's nonsense (Score 2) 84

They have realized [slashdot.org] that society is becoming ill at ease over AI. And they are creating a safety net for themselves.

Or maybe it's that they're capitalizing on said ill ease with AI, and leveraging it to instill a distrust of outsider AI's (Chinese, open source, etc..), enough so that they may manage to get the import thereof blocked, or at least pull a "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM" sort of management mentality.

Meanwhile, they didn't outline any features that existing worms and such are already capable of.

Comment Re:Documentation (Score 1) 59

I may have misunderstood your original comment:

Current AIs are only useful in areas where it's easy to recognize invalid results.

... misunderstood as the LLM directly recognizing some situation that is bad, as opposed to the LLM producing a result that can easily be tested for validity (like applying a test suite to a codebase and ensuring it still passes). If the latter, I mostly agree - with the same caveat you mentioned - your original "only" was a bit too restrictive, but not by much.

Slashdot Top Deals

We don't really understand it, so we'll give it to the programmers.

Working...