Comment Re:Trump cut the funding (Score 5, Insightful) 149
In jurisdiction, there is the principle: Ignorantia legis non excusat. We should apply the same principle to science. Ignorantia scientes non excusat. Being wrong about science is not an opinion. It's something you could rectify by educating yourself about science, in the same way you educate yourself about the legal situation before deciding something important. No judge will excuse you for having a "different legal opinion" about something that is clearly stated otherwise in the law. We should do the same for science. And if you don't like the way scientists are of a different opinion than you about the possible outcome of a political decision, it's not because they are activists, it's because they know something you want to ignore.
Comment Re:Wayback Time! (Score 3, Interesting) 108
That "someone" was Maureen O'Gara. She was trying to find PJ's identity, probably to discredit her.
Comment Re:Just lithium ion? (Score 2) 110
Comment Re:Decreased obesity (Score 5, Insightful) 132
Comment Re: Bet against Elon if you like (Score 1) 194
Comment Re:Units (Score 2) 95
Comment Re:Silver linings (Score 5, Insightful) 95
Comment Re:Kilowatt (Score 1) 95
Comment Re:US senators ae shiteaters who swallow (Score 1) 131
Comment Re:US senators ae shiteaters who swallow (Score 5, Informative) 131
Supersonic flight is incredibly noisy, and you don't want it above you.
Comment Re:peak slashdot-maxxing (Score 1) 111
Ate a lot of paint chips as a child, eh?
Comment Re:Probably for the better in the long run (Score 4, Interesting) 111
Climate change happens, and it is hanging fast, faster than ever in recorded geological times.
All's left to do is to answer three questions:
- Do we want Climate change?
- If no, do we want to do something about it?
- Whatever the answers to the two questions above, who will foot the bill?
There are people wanting to dodge the questions, especially the third one by hand waving and mumbling something about economy, technological advance and the market forces. And there are people who want answers.
Comment Re:Amazon is corrupt! (Score 4, Insightful) 22
I think it may be evidence that Amazon has a shitty corporate culture that squeezes every penny it can out its employees.
Corruption can happen anywhere, but it's more likely to happen in totalitarian cultures where people feel like the system is rigged anyway. That's why countries like Russia and China have corruption problems. But I suspect the same feelings of me vs. the system occur in a capitalist enterprise like Amazon where employees are governed by dystopian, rigid, computerized metrics.
Non-Invasive Stimulation of the Brain Ended Opioid Addiction, Cigarette Craving (jpost.com) 37
"Tests carried out a week later produced negative results for opioids and other substances," [said Dr. Lior Lev-Tov, director of the functional neurosurgery unit in Rambam's neurosurgery division and the one leading the new study at the medical center.] "The patient himself reported a craving score of zero out of 10 for using the drug, and even another side effect, a drastic drop in the desire for cigarettes, from three packs a day to just a few cigarettes, and with no urge to use alcohol. In other words, in a treatment that lasted about 20 minutes net, our patient was completely freed from an extreme dependence that had accompanied him every day for years. This is nothing less than a medical and therapeutic revolution."
Dr. Lev-Tov added that "This experience opens doors for us to treat a wide range of very serious illnesses such as PTSD, OCD, eating disorders, other addictions, severe depression, severe pain disorders, and I hope we will also be able to reach cognitive areas and treat attention deficit disorders, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and more."
Thanks to Slashdot reader Bruce66423 for sharing the article.