I'm curious about what constitutes focus on people. How close to a person is a violation? I see lots of YT videos shot in the EU with a lot of people in them. (Not trolling. Genuinely trying to understand.)

Look up prosopagnosia. I have it to a mild extent, and it can be extremely awkward socially. Having smart glasses that would show me the name of the person I'm facing would be great, but every other aspect of them is just plain creepy.

It also has twice the storage, so it's not all about the Touch Id. Everything costs money, even the Touch Id. If Apple intends to offer the cheapest laptop it can, then it does make sense. We got along just fine for a long time without biometrics. Touch Id mostly adds convenience. And, given what I've observed, people tend to use their laptops with an admin account and either no password or a simple 1234 style password.

I avoid PayPal if possible, as I'm tired of them trying to push crap at me before I can even get to why I went there in the first place. Perhaps if they allowed customers to use their product without constantly trying to advertise to them they might be more popular.

All one has to do is click on the link to the cited article immediately after the title, in this case "(pnas.org)". But, yes, linking to the article in the summary would also be good.

It seems as though our present administration wants to revert to the 50s. Trying to block wind turbines is just another example of actively fighting against progress.

Our local police department has a drone, DJI I believe. While they have used it for searching for a suspect, its primary use is SAR and supporting wildland fire suppression. It has already saved lives and helped mitigate wildland fires faster than without. We are a small rural county with a limited budget. Replacing it with a US based solution is cost prohibitive. Not replacing it could cost lives.

Given that Facebook is a sewer pit of consistently wrong and/or misleading posts, and that the FB algorithm tends to create a strong echo chamber for a user, this approach will do nothing but make the social media shit show even worse. No good will come from this.

The DJI consumer grade drones have gotten very capable. It makes me wonder if there is a growing concern within the US government that individuals can, or already are, using them to monitor government activities. After all, we can't allow anybody to watch the watchers.

So obviously, there isn't a problem.

Wasn't this all hashed out before, and it was determined that the email servers sending the Republican emails was misconfigured so the emails legimately looked like spam?

My 2024 Outback Touring has physical buttons for temperature and front/rear defrost. The rest of the HVAC controls are on the touchscreen, but never move, and I can reliably use them with just a momentary glance, about what I would do for analog controls. Coupled with CarPlay, I rarely have to use the touchscreen for regular driving chores.

That's because Facebook jams Threads down the user's throat. My wife uses FB and is constantly confused by why links don't work properly, and what is this Threads thingie?

But, blinders are for horses, and this is a horseless carriage.

It doesn't matter; blinders are a requirement, and we're just trying to keep our roads safe.

I stopped trusting CR many years ago based on a car review. They significantly downgraded what was generally accepted as a great car because the hatchback didn't open high enough, and somebody might hit their head on the corner of it. Yes, it's a valid point. Making it a significant factor not to recommend the car was ridiculous.