Comment Re:The problem with AI is over reliance .... (Score 1) 68
Complete nonsense, of course. You just gave an nice example of how to NOT do it.
Complete nonsense, of course. You just gave an nice example of how to NOT do it.
Yes. Up to and including "cognitive surrender". The most idiotic morons even want AI to write code that then gets reviewed by AI and they deeply believe everything will be fine with that approach.
AI can help. It cannot do the full job. For LLM-type AI that will likely remain true forever, because LLMs cannot do reliability.
The Kernel is very rationally maintained. If AI slop becomes too much of a problem (and it likely will), it will get banned. It has its chance now. Maybe it will work out, maybe not. With other abject AI failures to do secure code or to find most security problems in code, I expect that in 2-3 years, this will get resolved. All it takes is some major screw-ups.
And why, oh so wise one, have they not done that blatantly obvious and cheap thing?
All you are proving here is that you have absolutely no clue how things actually work.
Don't be a lazy fuck. Do some research before disgracing yourself.
Well...
Well, the US had sort-of peace and even nuclear inspection, before criminal idiot Trump came along and had to, again, misdirect away from him raping teenagers.
And no, the US cannot reasonably occupy Iran. It would break the US military and economy. And it would have to be done very long term. The US did not even manage that in Afghanistan, and that has about half the population of Iran.
Agreed. This is completely pathetic.
Hence the numbers I gave. Most people questioning authority do indeed just want some other authority in power.
With AI agents not even being remotely secure, anybody running this is asking for it.
This is about keeping the market _diverse_. It is anti-trust measures that keep capitalism from devolving into monopolies. It is good for consumers and keeps vendors on their toes. It keeps innovation going. But lots of clueless Americans apparently want to be abused by big-tech.
Just that it is neither IP not trade secrets this is about. Try to keep up, you sound very stupid.
Indeed. Even Microsoft and YouTube react very fast when they get a GDPR request. Nobody sane wants to lose the EU.
If you think anti-trust law that gets actually enforced is "idiotic", you are welcome to stay in your oligarcist hell-hole.
Real wealth can only increase. -- R. Buckminster Fuller