AI is "super intelligence" in the same way that a computer is a "super calculator". In other words, it is not intelligent at all. It only does really fast pattern-matching, just like a computer can do really fast numerical calculations.

On the other hand, compared to the average American, maybe it does appear to be super intelligent.

It is important to understand that while the target of this FCC threat appears to be Kimmel, the real target is you and me. We are to learn from this that saying in public things the administration doesn't like will bring down the full force of the federal government on your head, Constiturion be damned.

Bill Gates should burn in hell.

It's entirely possible that AI will soon be able independently to prove all of known mathematics, and then go on to resolve all the outstanding open problems. And then maybe it will start proposing new, interesting conjectures.

Do we really want this to happen? There are so few genuine pleasures in human life. Do we really need to build machines to take away yet another one, the esoteric pleasure of discovering a new mathematical proof?

Look what happened to the human race when machines came on the scene to do our physical labor. Prior to that time, people had the strength of giants. Now, almost everyone is, by comparison, a wimp. Do we really want the same kind of degeneracy to happen to our intellects?

They are saying the failure is "due to ongoing attitude control issues,"

A lof of us have attitude control issues.

Please see my reply to hutkept (above).

Thanks for the clarification, Ayn. And may you burn in your libertarian hell.

JFK initiated the "space race" with his call to send a man (i.e., an American) to the moon and safely return him. When it finally happened in 1969, his arch-enemy Nixon was president, so it is Nixon's name which is on the commemorative plaque sitting on the moon.

"Because they buy licenses in bulk, they get a sizeable discount". This makes no sense whatever. Generally, when you buy something "in bulk" you may get a discount because the per-unit ancillary costs (packaging, S&H. labeling, accounting, etc) are less. How does any of this apply to licensing, which is indistinguishable from selling air?

Walking in the middle of 5th Avenue is almost certain to get you run over. Do it, Donnie!

One of the more frustrating things about working in the windoze context is the difficulty, or often impossibility, of automating tasks. Their design "philosophy", such as it is (or isn't) is that the user is an integral part of the computer system. It's damn hard to get done anything that involves a lengthy sequence of steps without sitting in front of the screen throughout the whole process, just so you can click "yes" at certain points.

As I have often said, one of the Microsoft tactics is to waste as much of the end-user's time as possible.

Not so. Thunderbird is WAAAAY better that Outlook (AKA Look Out!). In fact even if Outlook worked as designed and intended (which it doesn't, much of the time) it would still be a piece of crap because that very design is poorly done.

Bill Gates should burn in Hell.

They can release all the raw reports they like, but the fact is there are no "aliens" visiting our Earth. One look at who is occupying the White House and those aliens said, "Forget it. We ain't going there."