Comment Re:Thank you, China (Score 1) 160
Comment Re:To the tune of "Another one bites the dust" (Score 1) 47
Comment Bigger toys for bigger boys (Score 1) 88
Comment Oh great, another piece of sh!7... (Score 1) 17
Comment So Who and When? (Score 1) 56
Comment Thieves with a social conscience (Score 1) 134
Comment Re:And people are surprised by this ?? (Score 1) 35
Comment Re:jokes on you (Score 1) 165
Comment Nice location for an underwater Datacenter (Score 3, Interesting) 18
Comment Re:Fuck DeX and fuck Samsung trying to suck its ow (Score 1) 50
Comment Re:Samsung Bad (Score 1) 97
Comment Puns aside... (Score 1) 388
Comment Gouging just changed its name, not its goal (Score 1) 145
Comment Re:A cure for which there is no disease (Score 1) 249
Same issue in Quebec (Canada). I didn't have a choice in my home. Either I let them install the e-meter, or I would have to pay Hydro Quebec $200/yr to keep my old, functioning very nicely for 15 years, mechanical meter.
I check my bill every month to see if there's some differences from the previous month or same period the year earlier, but so far, knock on wood, nothing amiss so far.
I am, however, ticked at the craziness of it all. These eMeters are more expensive per unit that the sound mechanical ones, they haven't been around long enough to give anyone a good idea of mean time to failure (MTTF). I've worked with embedded (now called IoT) devices for 20+ years, and no electronic device I've ever heard of has even 1/2 the MMTF of it mechanical device it's supposed to replace.
Not only that, but it contributes to additional wireless radiation and congestion on the wireless frequencies it uses to bunny hop to the closest meter or concentration point.
I can ramble on, but this is just another reason to hate these things.