Comment Re:This is a weird little hit piece (Score 1) 179
Sounds like a you problem, not an everyone else problem. Get some therapy for your fetish. Or perhaps you treasure your victimhood too much to ever do anything about it. You be you.
Sounds like a you problem, not an everyone else problem. Get some therapy for your fetish. Or perhaps you treasure your victimhood too much to ever do anything about it. You be you.
Most digital cameras filter it out these days. Sadly.
Hidden spy cameras, specifically designed to be hidden in clothing for secret photography, have been around since the late 19th century.
Nothing new here, dumbass. Including you being a dumbass.
Now go use one of your sock puppets to vote me down.
The exact same thing can be said of every other spy cam, which have been around for decades. They're not expensive, or hard to get. Why weren't you bitching about those 30 years ago?
When you don't like something, and you want others to not like it, the most effective method these days is to inspire rage. You can't inspire rage by being rational.
(And if you want to secretly record women, or anyone else, you don't need a phone. There have been tiny little easily concealed cameras for decades. )
And a few cops in the US have been jailed. Should be more, but you gotta start somewhere.
Doctors and nurses are subject to laws specific to those records. Police, not so much. Yet. They should be, and eventually they will be, but not yet. Especially when dealing with a private company's services.
Or a bot took over an old account. And you looks suspiciously like a sock for the same bot.
I wouldn't be surprised if you were, as your name states, a bot, possibly run by some foreign power and tasked with sowing any kind of dissidence possible in the US.
And that's exactly as credible as the nonsense you're spewing, based on the same nothing.
If the cops felt their time was wasted, there are already laws and procedures in place to deal with it. They apparently didn't feel that way, and they know what actually happened. You have nothing but a propaganda piece written by someone with, like you, and agenda.
There's a lot to hate about Flock. This isn't is, and you're making them look less bad than they should. One might even believe you're an AI bot run by Flock to generate sympathy for them.
And that, too, is as plausible as your nonesense.
The police disagree.
And they know what happened, where all you have is the propaganda article written by someone with an agenda.
You "noticed" that? I found it to be not well supported at all so it wasn't a consideration.
You found it inconvenient, and you ignored it, because you approve of illegal acts against people you don't like.
When they misrepresent what their goods and services can do (and they do), while taking money from investors, that is exactly what Theranos did.
I notice you ignore that the people "going around the perimeter of their property" were given a trespass notice. That means they were on private property. I'd guess they were in the parking lot, circling the building. Given how many crimes have already been committed against the company, in an escalating pattern, to not call the police would have been criminally negligent regarding their employee's safety.
And in neither incident were the activists (and that's what they are, calling themselves journalists or not) arrested after the cops determined what was going on.
And he wasn't arrested.
Given the increasingly nasty controversy over the company, and how common road rage turns violent in general, it's not unreasonable to be concerned over being followed. Especially considering the hundreds, if not thousand, of crimes committed against the company('s cameras) already, as the controversy escalates.
Yeah, in neither of the cases mentioned was the filming the issue the cops were responding to. In the first, it was following the installer down the road, which is always suspicious. In the second, they were trespassing on private property.
And in both cases, the cops established what was really going on, and responded appropriately - with no arrests.
You must realize that the computer has it in for you. The irrefutable proof of this is that the computer always does what you tell it to do.