Business "science" faking results, messing with numbers, is as old as Frederick Taylor.

Software comes with no warranty because nobody is willing to pay for it.

I haven't noticed any improvements in services provided. So either the companies/people I interact with do not use it, or it doesn't help a bit.

I'm glad I'm not paying for Disney+

making them predictable and controllable

LLMs aren't predictable. Giving them the same input twice does not produce the same result.

Ian Hodgkinson, a professor of strategy

at a business school.

Yes, that's a person I can trust on the subject of power consumption of data storage and climate control.

I can believe that 68% of data at companies are never used again. But do you know how many emails and memes you can fit into the data occupied by the Borderlands movie?

Desperate. They are in a desperate state, having their systems infected with ransom ware after all.

So we are supposed to guess what state Los Angeles County is located in?
There is no clue in TFC.

So they don't count Al scrapers as malicious? The TOS and robots.txt of my sites deny Al scrapers, yet, they continue to visit them a lot.

Generative Als mostly solve the problem for quantity of content. It is not the lack of content which is a problem, it is a bit more the quality of content, which the Als do not fix, they generally make it worse.

I really do not give a fuck about your reasons, you created this piece of shit, you are responsible for creation a serious privacy and security violation.
You should have resigned over implementing this.

The current Al (those LLMs) are a tool to get VC money, so it is working as intended.

The files are already on the mothership.

I prefer my maps to be factional rather than generative.

I thought it was a joke product like the Pomegranate phone.

You know when they say things look too good to be true...