The fact that you are eveven asking indicates that Slashdot has lost all objectivity, is a handpuppet for the oppressors, and is an enemy of freedom, and of frefree nations including the US and Canada.
It is unconstitutional. Period.
If slashdot was a newspaper with a building and a printing press, it would now be burned to the ground. Get out.
No. I think the anti-vax movement has been used as a smokescreen to call detractors from this shot tinfoil hat wearing nutbars. This shot is clearly not a vaccine; it is genetic therapy.
I believe those calls arr from taking the actual horse versions of the drug, after the human versions were all stolen from pharmacies across America"for our safety". Not confirmed.
Where are you getting that information? Oh. From employees of corporations making billions from this event after paying multibillion dollar fines for lying about safety of their other products. Cool.
Wrong. If it cures the patient after only one treatment, it's made illegal and called "alternative" medicine. If it treats the symptoms for a day or less, requiring the patient to return and pay again, then it's patented and called a pharmaceutical.
It warms my heart to hear about belligerent chip makers who shun open source get their teeth kicked in. I'm not exactly cheering for Google on that one but yeah, you wave your NDA in someone's face long enough they'll drop you on yours and make their own shit.