Comment Problem with providing OS software for profit: (Score 2) 87
Deliberately giving limits to a present version allows the company to charge a lot for a new version, even if the new version provides few important benefits.
Comment Re:They always blame the wrong thing(s) (Score 2) 75
not just "how do you solve the following in mathematics?", but more, "you are trying to do this, can you figure out the steps needed to make it happen?"
And coding can be a very good teaching tool for that. That should be the goal of teaching coding in schools, that and trying to spark an interest in the subject in children. Not preparing them for a career in software engineering.
As for AI, it's not going away, and kids will be using it. So teach them the stuff about it they are less likely to pick up on their own. Such as the dangers and pitfalls.
Comment Re: Their message is pretty simple (Score 1) 123
That will lock you out of using you tv smart features like disney+, netflix, etc as they will require updates to keep working. (we've already ran into with a different brand tv)
Submission + - AI: Many discussions, no underlying explanation. 1
We need a book, or other information, that explains how AI technology functions.
Comment Re:New business opportunity (Score 2, Interesting) 99
Comment Re:Is this really what people will pay for? (Score 1) 179
That "Nitro" stuff makes zero sense rationally. My guess is pure appeal to vanity.
If you're vain enough to want to stand out with exclusive emojis or animated whatevers, then spending money on a Nitro subscription makes rational sense.
Comment Re:Which is it? (Score 1) 126
Translation: The idiot employee in Sector G-7 will never push the big, red button that disables the cooling pumps to the nuclear reactor.
D'oh....
Comment Re: heh (Score 1) 126
Whether you're 20, 30, 40, or 50, you're gonna be fucked by AI in some way in the next decade. It doesn't matter if you're old or not.
How?
Can you give some realistic, meaningful ways the average person like myself will be fucked by AI?
Comment Re:Not just there (Score 1) 140
just dump it in the sea.
Thus solving the problem once and for all.
- Yes, but...
ONCE AND FOR ALL!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Comment Re:Which is it? (Score 5, Insightful) 126
It won't destroy us because it "decides" to; LLMs do not make decisions. It optimizes for certain goals, using shitty instructions and shitty training data. Which means that under certain conditions it can make completely unexpected and illogical actions, like those Chinese bipedal robots glitching out. So... it will destroy us because - under certain conditions - it will utterly suck at its job.
Submission + - Why can't M$ get any UI/UX changes right? (pcmag.com) 1
Um, No...
The fundamental set of [lost] attributes that this "We brought Movable TaskBar back" lacks:
You can not control the position of the TaskBar on each desktop monitor--example: I have four displays on my desktop, three Landscape & one of which is in a Portrait orientation for reading documents.
With Windows7/8/10 you could position the TaskBar so that it was "Out of the way" and each display--on the right side of the right-most Landscape, on the left for the left-most Landscape display, & on the top/bottom for the Portrait. [same as my desktop on my Linux workstation]
Now you still get the same Taskbar alignment on all desktops.
You can not "resize" the taskbar. (well, you can--it has three sizes: too big, too small, and really way too small) For the previous three generations of the OS you could "Drag-Select" and resize the TaskBar to be the correct size for your needs on your desktop. [...just as I can on my KDE Desktop!]
With this implementation, 1/3 of the Taskbar real estate is consumed with "TaskBar-Tray Notification Icons."
Nobody asked for a partial, broken, re-implementation. The ask was: "Put it Back as it was!"
Dealing with M$ is pretty much like getting your 15 year old to do their chores on garbage night.
Comment Re: Summer vs Winter (Score 1) 200
Comment Re:When demand nears peak capacity. (Score 1) 200
They just turn off your water heater.
What good does turning the gas off to the water heater do....?
Comment Re: Summer vs Winter (Score 1) 200
If you can cope at 12C in a T-shirt
... up to you, I wear a real jacket and a scarf.
Ugh...had to get on ChatGPT and find out what the fuck 12C was in F.
Ok, so about 54F...roughly. That's cool...I guess depends a bit on how high your humidity is. In the New Orleans area, it can be 54F and very humid...if the wind is coming in off the lake it can be quite chilly....but if lower humidity, more into winter months,...that's not too cold...I'd be wearing a sweater or a jacket....not both.