Comment Re:Who's waste is it? (Score 1) 63
There have already been improvements. The practice was banned outright, by everyone, 30 years ago.
=Smidge=
There have already been improvements. The practice was banned outright, by everyone, 30 years ago.
=Smidge=
Why would that be *critical* information?
Would the problem be worse or lessened if it was from the US? Britain? France? Japan? It is more or less a disaster if it's military weapons waste or civilian power waste?
Or are you just upset you don't get to point fingers?
=Smidge=
KDE seems to need more GPU than I have on that machine (RX 560). It stuttered and shook and the widgets editor flashes once and vanishes before you can do anything.
I'm typing this on the 2010 laptop I use daily. I just disable all animations in KDE advanced settings. Then it is snappy and always responds instantly. I have no problem doing raw image edition, even video edition.
> whereas normally you'd have to wait for the harm to happen to sue
False. You can file a suit for any reason at any time. You do not have to wait until any harm is done. This does not, of course, mean the judge has to accept your filing.
But in this case, the 'harm' is that they are slowing down development/improvement of a product you are paying for. If you buy into a service on the promise or reasonable expectation that the vendor of that service will continue to improve it, and then they declare that they will drag their feet, that's a type of harm because you're not getting what you reasonably expected to be getting for your money.
Ultimately it's up to the judge to decide if there's enough meat on that bone to proceed to the next phase, but it's enough to get the paperwork started.
=Smidge=
So stalking is constitutional, then?
'cause it's not just "recording in public" it's full tracking and profiling. Who you are, where you are, when you're there. A full record of your daily activities from the moment you walk out your front door to the moment you get home again.
If the government was doing this directly in the same manner as these corporations do (e.g. without a warrant) it would 100% be a violation of your constitutional rights. The fact that the government does it by proxy, letting a private corporation do all the dirty work for them, really does not change the fundamental complaint here.
=Smidge=
Then if oil is flowing so freely, why am I paying 4.50$/gal for gasoline?
We're playing with machines that we don't fully understand, which can move faster than we can, and we're giving them more and more autonomy. AIs don't have to kill ALL humans for us to legitimately begin to worry. A black swan event where a bunch of automated systems all suddenly begin maximizing the wrong expectation value at the same time could cause a massive global catastrophe so fast the damage would be done before anyone even knew it was happening, let alone be able to halt it.
Oh, you just mean every who isn't on the approved list.
There are methods to add noise patterns to audio that are imperceptible to humans but cause AI to go apeshit, such as misidentifying rock music as classical or transcribing speech as something completely different from what is said.
I wonder what the practicalities might be to deploy this form of attack in an area around you when having a conversation you with to keep private. Probably would not be inaudible when played through a speaker (unlike data implanted in audio recordings) but maybe masked? Listen to some music on your phone's loudspeaker at a modest volume and broadcast invisible noise that fills any eavesdropping AI's buffer with junk or even malicious payloads.
=Smidge=
The aim of science is to seek the simplest explanations of complex facts. Seek simplicity and distrust it. -- Whitehead.