Comment Re: FB was great initially (Score 1) 112
The original model for Facebook was collecting information on women at college to make it easier for zuck to fuck them.
The original model for Facebook was collecting information on women at college to make it easier for zuck to fuck them.
Yes, profit grew it... Into a monster.
You clowns who worship prosperity never will understand sustainability.
Climate change... Another fine product of the same capitalism that brought us racism.
I don't ever trust that any AC isn't a liar. They often are.
I used to get quite a bit of Google traffic from web search results. I have good metadata and my content makes links to relevant resources, I did no other "SEO" type activities. Now it's nearly nothing.
What's harmful is having information hidden from you.
There's an easy and available solution, spend time with your kids. She can afford to do so, so SHE has no excuse.
This is not a valid comparison. The USAID program was a purely voluntary system that injected money overseas to help struggling areas. It not being there means life just returned to normal.
Typical arrogant elitist thieving colonialist bullshit. The wealthy countries got that way by stealing from less developed countries, USAID is a way of slightly making redress for that. You sound exactly like the fuckheads who say we should let Ukraine fend for itself when they only gave up their nuclear program because we promised to protect them. Fuck you and the horse that rode in on you.
I'm not aware that any of the corporations which provide the actual "backbone" of the internet , which is to say all the relays and address handlers, are in any way blocking or deleting any traffic.
Straw man noted and sn!ggered at.
Oh look, the word filter is shit as usual.
Nvidia is definitely underwater with circular financing, but that doesn't mean nobody is successfully extracting wealth from it.
What's needed is a web of trust moderation system which can be used to filter email, Usenet, and social media sites. Go forth and write!
They don't want any competition for their own malevolent disinformation, which is redundant.
And she's right, she has herself as an example.
Unfortunately she's incapable of understanding this means that she is a terrible parent.
This place is run by crypto thugs who are also invested in AI. It's not a surprise when they mod down posts which threaten their portfolios.
"The "people" presumably the public have zero clue what work you directly produced. They see a road was built. They elected an official who ran on a policy of building roads. No one cares if "Arrogant-Bastard" (LOL, thanks, I don't often get a chuckle when looking up who I'm talking to, though you don't come across as one
This is not only false in that there are people who care, but it's also false in that they have a right to know and they can get that information via FOIA request in the US.
"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." -- Vince Lombardi, football coach