The reality is that they are very much still one of the biggest risks of destroying humanity and very much a worry for all.
Their existence is insane. The problem is, they go with nationalism like bread and butter.
We regulate certain things more or less out of existence because they're dangerous. Certain types of products which people can't or won't make themselves can be prohibited from sale, for example. I generally am in favor of legalizing things and enforcing laws against fraud, so that people get honest information about consequences, but I also like for people to be protected from other people.
Tobacco products are my favorite example because they affect people who aren't even using them. We allow them to persist only because of a profitable and highly taxable industry, not because of any notions about freedom. Freedom would be to permit you to grow your own instead of enabling the cancer stick industry, and let all the smokers move to farms in the south.
How do you feel about Iran's terrorist demands?
I feel like they are asking for the sun. Are you new to negotiations?
I also feel like all of this could have been avoided by just not doing what we've been doing. For decades.
Here's a fun fact, there's a clearing house colloquially known as the "federal hub" where your name, DOB, SSN, and ID numbers can be rubbed together and your citizenship verified in seconds if you're well-documented. It takes longer to verify noncitizen status, but citizenship is stupidly easy to verify once identity has been verified, and registered noncitizens are required to carry their citizenship documents anyway... authorization to work, legal permanent resident card, passport, etc etc. Those are also all photo ID.
The passport is the gold star of verification, as it verifies both citizenship and identity anywhere in the US.
Addictive products are just good products! Have a cigar.
It's more that they have seen they can count on protectionism. Which ironically they also hate because it subjects them to dealers
Indeed. Here in California we are the poster children for this, because we have a 55 mph speed limit while towing which is NEVER enforced. We have a requirement that headlights be aimed correctly, same. We have a law saying that if there are five or more people behind you, you must pull over at the first safe opportunity to let them pass, same. Fender flares must project as far as tires, same. (Anyone who's ever had a rock break their windshield understands.)
CHP cares specifically and only about revenue generation, so they do nothing to improve safety except go after speeders. That's not nothing, but it's not enough.
If they weren't they wouldn't buy their shit, so they KNOW they're stupid
First, Iran has never been close to having a weapon
Second, if they do want one, it's because their primary enemies have one, and one of them is the only country to ever nuke another country
Or the gravel pit
How the FCC is powerless to enforce net neutrality while at the same time enforcing bans under the guise of software security.
The FCC isn't making these decisions. They are made by the DoD and the DHS, per the initial announcement.
It's an argument for those of us who are happy with simplicity/manual operation for less cost.
Manual windows don't reduce cost much unless you're going to put them on a lot of vehicles, otherwise it's just more parts you need to design and stock, meanwhile window motors are shared between multiple vehicles. Statistically nobody would rather have manual windows on a vehicle which costs even $40k so it might actually increase costs to offer them.
Not after the bribes are paid.
"Iran have been planning and trying to get nukes forever."
That's what naziyahoo says every time Israel needs money for more bombs, and you internalized it because your mind is weak.
Programmers used to batch environments may find it hard to live without giant listings; we would find it hard to use them. -- D.M. Ritchie