If it is morally justifiable to assassinate Iran's leader, then is it equally morally justifiable to assassinate the leaders of other countries who may pose a threat to yours?

One has to wonder what the Israeli government's end game is. Not just in Gaza, or the West Bank, but in its military threats to Syria and now its attack on Iran.

This isn't the principle screw-up. If a non-renewable source, say gas, kicks in for a charging period, then the whole of the electricity price for that period is determined by the gas price, rather than just the percentage of energy that it produces.

"How will this impact people", and, "What effect will this have on society" aren't questions that get asked by the tech bros. The question that does get asked is, "How can I monetise these for my benefit"

Incidentally, the "AI apocalypse" was deemed to be in progress in an article the other day. Presumably, the Butlerian jihad can't be far behind.

Europe is already offering places to American academics and is looking to attract even more.

Suppose that these academics do move and, even after Trump goes, they can see the MAGA interference in the education system. Would you want to move back to the US again?

As a prospective student, would you look at American universities where star names have gone elsewhere, and where you would face severe visa restrictions and decide that is the place you want to be?

What Rubio is effectively saying is that American law will apply everywhere and override any national laws.

It supports the fact that Xitter has refused to remove a video showing a stabbing video, viewed by someone who went on to stab three children and was wrongly characterised on social media as an illegal immigrant and Muslim, even though he was born in the UK and Christian.

The UK also has laws that prevent the harassment of women attending family planning clinics. These too have been characterised as censorship by members of the Trump administration.

They probably bought the unbranded ones from Amazon.

You do know that possibiliter ergo probabiliter is a logical fallacy?

Unless the person making the claim presents me with some backing for it, then I am justified in invoking Hitchen's Razor.

Well I don't know, I would need some evidence to decide. Do you actually have any?

The question is, how long before Kennedy guts the FDA, making it incapable of either approving or clearing medications of any kind.

I note that scientists are already considering moving from the US and that academics are being invited to France amongst other European countries.

Just another example of, "Socialize the risk, privatize the profits".

Given Betteridge's law of headlines, the answer is a definitive "No".

The only thing that I trust Zuckerberg to do is to ensure that any profit in a transaction goes to him, and nobody else.

Aren't people like Walz and Vance DEI hires? Neither of them seem to have been hired for competence, surely it must have been because of their ethnicity and gender.

Ah, the sweet smell of Tregret in the air...

Two things:

1. You seem to be ignoring the fact that there are subsidies for installing ASHP
2. You are also ignoring the fact that the UK is made up of four countries, and that the subsidies vary from country to country.

I live in a late Victorian house. When we moved in, there was no insulation. Couple this with the house being single glazed, and heating provided by 1970's storage heaters, and the house cost a fortune to keep warm. (I should also add that the majority of the lighting was still incandescent bulbs).

We replaced the single glazing by a mixture of double and triple glazing, insulated the walls and ceilings and installed an ASHP. All of this was supported by a mixture of grants and loans from the Scottish government.

My only complaint now is that despite the fact that Scotland is nearly self-sufficient in renewable energy, I still have to pay for electricity that is pegged to the gas price.