You do realise that the request for an extension came from both candidates?

You know, if you had looked at media outlets such as ABC News you would have found that both candidates teams asked for extensions.

If you actually look at reports from some of the more reputable media, both Lula's and Bolsanoro's teams asked for the extension.

So you can't (or won't) give your opinion on which newspapers we should trust, not do you present any evidence as to why we should not trust the Guardian.

Given this, is there any reason that we should take your opinion seriously?

So which publications do you deem "unbiased and balanced" sources of news?

As David Hume showed long ago, the fact that something happened regularly in the past is not a guarantee that it will happen in the future.

Lula secured 51.79% of the votes compared with Bolsonaro’s 48.21%, according to Brazil’s Superior Electoral Court – about 4.4m more votes. If, according to you, this warrants scrutiny then presumably if Lula had won 48.21% and Bolsanaro 51.79% then this too would warrant scruting...

I see that Flávio Bolsonaro is refusing to accept the result. How long before the attack on the National Congress Palace?

Really? Got evidence?

I am baffled that they were going to build this centre in Essex, which is more crowded and expensive than other parts of the UK. We need to convince foreign businesses that other parts of the UK, apart from London and the SE of England exist. There are lots of places in the north of England, Scotland and Wales where connection to the National Grid is easier, and where other costs are substantially lower.

A satisfied user of openSUSE.

Personally though, I would say, forget about "what distribution" and ask "what tasks do I need to carry out" and work backwards from there.

When you were last in Luton did you wander around the town, just like everyone else?

Would you care to tell us what the problem is "outside of the home counties"?

There was a deal between the US and Iran that was negotiated during Obama's presidency. You might argue that it wasn't the best of deals, but it did lower tensions, and constrained what Iran could do.

Trump didn't attempt to improve the deal, he just withdrew from it in 2018, which removed the constraints on Iran enriching uranium. He has done nothing to fix this in either of his terms in office.

Ah, so it took place during Biden's presidecy, therefore it was purely down to Biden, no other factors whatsoever.

Iran is a vile, authoritarian theocracy. So what success has Trump had reducing or eliminating the authoritarianism of the regime? How goes the negotiations to end the war and reopen shipping in the Middle East?

You have a theory, in this case General Relativity, that has been confirmed by testing for many decades. Experimental data shows anomalies that the theory cannot explain. So either:

- The theory is wrong (or incomplete)
- Our ontology is wrong
- Or both of the above

So, what do you do? Do you abandon the theory, in spite of the huge amount of evidential backing, or do you change the ontology while you investigate further?

Yeah, it's a well known fact that all astrophysicists are coining it, they are all as rich as Zuckerberg, if not Musk.

Oh and "Prove it"? As anyone who knows anything about science is aware, you don't prove things in science. Our theories are the best, current explanation for phenomena, but they are both tentative and provisional. Proof is for mathematics, logic and whisky, for science we have evidence.

I would put it another way, always favour those who will increase the wealth of Trump and his family.

There are a number of European search engines. The major problem is that people don't know that they exist.

So, it's going to include all the Greek gods, Scylla and Charybdis, the Cyclops, Circe, Calypso, Sirens, man-eating giants etc. This should ensure it is "historically accurate". Oh, and all the actors will of course be white, not olive skinned.