Comment Re:Perforce (Score 1) 35
BitKeeper also did everything Git could back in the day.
BitKeeper also did everything Git could back in the day.
I thought these Al were really intelligent and powerful, why do I need special skills for them? Can't I just tell them what to do?
Those javax -> jakarta packages were not part of the JRE. However, those common interfaces are extremely popular. So you probably use a framework or library which uses them and has transitioned to the newer packages. But you could still use the old frameworks or libraries in a newer JRE, assuming they do not use a library that messes with JVM bytecode (which is commonly used to create more advanced class proxies). Javaassist, OW2 ASM, and the likes are the problematic parts for moving on to a newer JRE. These libraries are used a lot. In most cases you cannot simply drop in a new bytecode manipulating library. That's where you run into the part where you have to move your software to newer frameworks and libraries which then also mean you need to change some of your code to go to the jakarta packages. And then you need to hope your software didn't abused some undocumented behavior/features, or internals, of those frameworks.
Yes, there is a high probability that your (enterprise) software will need code changes in order to run on newer JREs.
Nine years ago we already had a funny prompt injection: https://www.bbc.com/news/techn...
Which was then used commercial by Burger King: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Can't wait for the new ad prompt injections.
If it's still ongoing or cancelled should be a warning to everybody of the risk of being tied to Microsoft.
Oh no... they are in danger.
A human who has seen the source code cannot be part of the team producing a clean room implementation. They will taint the project with their general knowledge of the system they try to rebuild.
20 years ago BonziBuddy could do the same, and people were losing their mind if they encountered it on a system
Could always run for president of the USA
And who had to dig through those false positives to find the actual issues.
Further more, the article doesn't mention the security issues, nor the software it was found in. Just the number 500.
The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its credibility. And vice versa.