Comment Re:Still not mature (Score 1) 236
This thing needs a few years more of actual development and stabilizing before you can depend on it.
The btrfs community and developers have been saying this for at least the past 10 years and sending out mixed signals about btrfs' production-readiness. I've suffered from data loss almost every time I've used btrfs.
Most common issues I encounter are disk being full even thought the files on the disk cannot possibly take so much space as to fill the entire disk and performance especially with games and databases. Also sometimes regardless if I'm using SSD or mechanical HDD, sometimes system just freezes when using btrfs and this has been an on-going issue for me past 5 years with btrfs test installs. And really infuriating when it starts to occur in SailfishOS. At this point I don't think it is possible to fix btrfs with more development because it clearly is defective by design.
I mainly use plain ext4 but also lvm+ext4. However I've been phasing lvm+ext4 out in favour of zfs. I'm quite disappointed about Fedora's recent decision to default to btrfs and I'm now planning to move to Ubuntu because they ship working easy zfs-on-root solution anyone can install.