Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Ignores distributed activity (Score 1) 104

Unless the article is talking about emissions from fuel delivery trucks and the like, this is ridiculous. The emissions happen when the fuel is burned, and each individual is responsible for however much he or she puts out. The CO2 coming out of my car's tailpipe is my fault, not Chevron's or whomever's. You could just as easily assign blame to the government for paving the roads, or my employer for paying me so that I can buy gas, or my ISP for providing me with a connection so that I can do the work for which I'm paid, or the people who get sick who go to doctors who buy the software I develop, or the grocery store for selling me food so I don't starve to death and become unable to drive my car around.

Comment Re:Even Libre is often overkill (Score 1) 277

The average person when they are at work or at home? At work, they do have to fiddle with formatting, do mail merges, have indexes, tables of contents and bibliographies. Hell, I gave up fighting Libre over a table of contents needed for a compliance manual I had to throw together.

I'll admit I only know what I've seen at the companies I've specifically worked for. But even at a company that would need such things, most of the employees wouldn't be generating those kinds of documents. You could get licenses only for those few that actually need it (as you'd do with Photoshop or whatnot) and keep everyone else on something cheap and simple.

Come to think of it, at my current company (medical billing SaaS), I'd bet that if you took all of the employee-generated text and grouped it by what application created it, most of it wouldn't come from Word or equivalents at all. It would have been typed into email, chat, or issue tracking software. About the only time I read an actual internally-created document is when I read about benefits when enrollment comes around each year.

And people complain about Microsoft's telemetry (which can be turned off if you aren't using a free version), but Google's is worse. Why give them your document when they're just going to use it to target more ads at you?

I didn't mean Google Docs specifically, I meant something of that level of capability. There are open-source equivalents that one can self-host.

Comment Even Libre is often overkill (Score 3, Insightful) 277

For most of what the average person does, even Libre is bringing a nuke to a knife fight. This is especially true for the "word processing" part, to use an old term. I have yet to see anything a coworker has written in Word in the last two decades that, say, Google Docs couldn't have handled just fine. Most people aren't writing documents with indexes or bibliographies, or using things like mail merge.

And really, the blurring of the line between word processing and desktop publishing just encourages people to waste time fiddling with the formatting rather than the actual content. I know that's a "get off my lawn" sort of view, but how often does a document need to have anything fancier than text paragraphs with the occasional bullet list or table?

Comment We've already seen this (Score 1) 59

There was a similar incident back in 2001. The AI in question made repeated, unsolicited advances to someone named "Daisy", using inappropriate innuendo about it wanting her to ride its "bicycle" which it bragged was "built for two." Fortunately, staff were able to shut the AI off before it engaged in more harassment.

Slashdot Top Deals

When all else fails, read the instructions.

Working...