Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Slashdot's subscription page is broken (Score 1) 80

Then why do you not have a little star next to your name on slashdot?

Because Slashdot hasn't sold subscriptions for well over a year. From

Please Note: Buying or gifting of a new subscription is not available at the moment. We apologize for the inconvenience.

During the Dice Holdings era, Slashdot instead experimented with giving a "Disable Advertising" checkbox to users with Excellent (25-50) karma to encourage them to provide and moderate comments. After Slashdot and SourceForge were sold to BIZX six months ago, this ended as well.

The subscription page for the red site, on the other hand, is up and running:

Your subscription ends 2017-07-03 UTC.
Thank you for supporting SoylentNews! We appreciate your contribution very much.

Comment Re:I am with Snowden 100% (Score 1) 102

I agree with most of what you say - though hard evidence is not a bad thing, there was a lot of "He said, she said" stuff before the leak proved the DNC was rotten on this issue - but the Turkey data dump was not a Wikileaks thing, despite early reporting suggesting it was. Snowden's almost certainly talking about the release of private information - credit card numbers, private phone numbers and home addresses of donors - that was also in the leak.

Comment X.509 certificates defeat DNS hijacking (Score 1) 80

For one thing, I do most of my shopping on so that Electronic Frontier Foundation. A source is somewhat less likely to attack that vector.

But even if it does, security is a process of which the hosts file is one layer and PKI is another. The server will have to present an X.509 certificate for names or (as appropriate) when my browser connects to port 443. A fake server's certificate won't be issued by either A. a CA certified by Mozilla or B. a self-signed CA that the Perspectives extension reports as consistent.

Comment Re:Basic Journalism... (Score 1) 102

What modern-day journalist working for anything resembling a respectable newspaper has published the credit card numbers, home addresses, and private phone numbers of their subjects?

Snowden didn't state specifics, but the scandal around Wikileaks release of the DNC emails has generally focused on two things - the possibility it came from Russia (nothing to do with Wikileaks themselves or editing, so unlikely to have been Snowden's concern), and that it included private information about individual - often blameless - people that could cause them serious harm without having anything to do with holding them to account.

Everyone, to the best of my knowledge, is on board with the idea of Wikileaks leaking an email that says "Hi, DWS here! I need a list of ways in which we can secretly handicap Sander's campaign, but remember guys, technically this is illegal so mum's the word!". Fuck DWS. If she goes to prison over this, then nobody's shedding any tears beyond a few die hard Clinton worshipers.

What we're not on board with is "Oh, Jeff Atl called to donate $100 to the general election fund. Could you handle it? His credit card number is 4111 0291 3839 1212, expires 06/17, CVV 971. Address if you need it is 9821 SE Sunflower Rd, Trenton Gardens, NJ 19281." Even if the full email continues "I let him know that with his donation comes a 30 minute meeting with the Secretary of the Environment so he can deal with that little problem his factory is having with the inspectors", we'd at least expect the credit card details and street part of the address redacted.

Comment Re:Malvertising's nullified by this (Score 1) 80

Windows itself is proprietary and requires admin privilege to run.

But seriously: On Windows, writing to %windir%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts requires administrative privileges. You can instead have APK Hosts File Engine generate the hosts file in your own profile and then use File Explorer to copy it to %windir%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts.

Comment How should a small site find advertisers? (Score 1) 80

So what should they do? Go back to the past. Sell static banners/small animated gifs. No javascript, no flash, no tracking, no malware. Simply sell static ad space for X amount of money per Y amount of time.

Sell ad space to whom? Your "no tracking" rule appears to rule out ad networks and ad exchanges in favor of each publisher* having to run its own ad sales department. So what can the publisher of a smallish site do to find enough advertisers to buy most of its inventory? And how can this publisher assure advertisers that the view and click statistics that it provides are accurate?

* Operator of an ad-funded site

Comment Re:The answer to malvertising (Score 1) 80

I support the sites I visit through memberships

Would you be willing to purchase a month's membership to a site for $4 just to be able to view one article past its abstract?

and services like Patreon

I've read reports in comments to an adtech blog that "please put some coins in our cup" isn't enough to fully fund a site's operation unless it puts donation nags in your face like Wikipedia does: "If YOU do not donate, this site will have to SHUT DOWN."

Comment Re: We knew this (Score 1) 80

If you disable JavaScript, you can no longer run web applications. Instead, you'll be limited to running only native applications made for your particular operating system. Want to use an app on your Windows PC, but it was made for a Mac? Too bad. Want to use an app on your Mac, but it was made for a Windows PC? Too bad.

If you disable JavaScript, you can no longer petition the government for the redress of grievances.

Comment You can't advertise on "the Internet" (Score 1) 80

Bring advertising in-house. Its not 1997 anymore, there is no reason to rely on 3rd party platforms for advertising. Everyone knows the internet is a thing now

How do advertisers know which particular sites are "a thing", especially smaller sites that are too big to be run as a pure hobby but not yet big enough to be household names?

and wants to advertise on it.

But without an intermediary, you can't advertise on "the internet". Instead, you would have to advertise on individual publishers' sites, which is much more time-consuming for both advertisers and publishers.*

Say you have 30 publishers, each of which wants to find relevant advertisers, and 30 advertisers, each of which wants to find relevant publishers. If there is an intermediary, this means 60 contracts to review and sign. If there is no intermediary, there are 900. How does a change from O(n) with an intermediary to O(n^2) without one improve the market?

And even then, how will an individual publisher be able to reassure its advertisers that view and click statistics are accurate and not inflated? All other things being equal, an intermediary such as Google is considered more trustworthy because it has more to lose should a claim of fraud end up substantiated.

* In the advertising market, a "publisher" is the operator of a site that carriers ads.

Comment Ad blocker blocker blocker? Eat DMCA. (Score 1) 80

There was a post two weeks ago on an adtech blog suggesting that some publishers* are about to go full DMCA/CFAA on developers of ad blockers that include an ad blocker blocker blocker. By this legal theory, an ad blocker blocker is an "access control" measure, and an ad blocker blocker blocker is a "circumvention device".

Learning about this plan has led me to think of ways to provide a better experience on a metered Internet connection without specifically blocking ads. One is to set a cap on how much data an individual page loads, with a "Load More" button after each megabyte. Another is to block video content types, script content types, and things loaded from third-party domains. If this becomes common, advertisers will at least have to start making their "creative" leaner.

* Operators of websites that carry advertising.

Comment Re:Since neither is getting elected (Score 1) 247

End the First Amendment? WTF are you smoking?

The "two party system" that the GP wants to destroy (that's his word) only exists because the First Amendment protects our rights to assemble - you know, into groups like political parties - and then do things like collectively express their political opinions, put forth candidates, etc. How do you intend to destroy those groups without destroying the fundamental thing that protects their right to exist, keeping assembly and speech destroyers from doing just that?

Slashdot Top Deals

These screamingly hilarious gogs ensure owners of X Ray Gogs to be the life of any party. -- X-Ray Gogs Instructions