Comment Re:Unions (Score 1) 67
So then you support laws that empower unions to do more than just fund leadership's politics?
So then you support laws that empower unions to do more than just fund leadership's politics?
Democracy is for retards.
Government did this. All of this. Government regulated so much that only a rare few can afford to compete.
This is late stage statism. Retard voters are to blame.
Like you.
The manufacturers aren't the problem. They aren't the ones who make the rules about how their product is used on public thoroughfares.
The context of that phrase is almost always used for people who invite regulation with their own foolish/dangerous behavior.
At least this time you presented something more nuanced than "people can't afford housing because they spend too much on other things". You could have led with that.
Also, I live about as far from California as is geographically possible within the lower 48, so I'm not assuming any blame for what happens there.
What makes you think it's rich people who are doing the hiring?
Pretending that the cost of housing is a problem only for people who refuse to live within their means is certainly one way to show why resentment of the rich is near an all-time high.
Why would anyone want to work for a company that does stuff like this??
This looks like the latest escalation in the tug-o-war between employers and remote workers. The relatively few people going to extraordinary efforts just to avoid doing the job they're being paid to do is going to ruin it for everyone else. Do you want to make return-to-office mandatory? Because creating AI fakes to pretend to be on work meetings sounds like a good way to make that happen.
Grok was constantly say it was doing something that it had ZERO ability to, and I kept calling it out and it kept apologizing and then immediately doing it again.
As a guy who spend 5 figures a year on Ai, the last thing I want is that. I know Claude and ChatGPT also do it, but Grok was doing it CONSTANTLY.
Bots and other bad actors thrive in free (as in beer) environments, for reasons that should be obvious. If we want to do anything meaningful about them, sites will need a nominal but real fee to use.
It's not what anyone wanted, but "free" was always inevitably going to lead to the Internet becoming a dump. The free ride is over.
This will not end well.
Why is this a problem?
I do not want my software censoring anything I make.
Neoliberalism and liberalism are two totally different things.
Ai will just shine the light on the class of workers who have make-work just that exist solely to push them to vote harder.
When we can let markets replace them, itâ(TM)ll be a tragedy for a few generations and then it will be forgotten.
Mausoleum: The final and funniest folly of the rich. -- Ambrose Bierce