That was about their opinion shows, not their news shows. That case was specifically about Tucker Carlson.
Those kinds of arguments weren't saving Fox from the Dominion lawsuit, though. If they seemed like to have worked, Fox wouldn't have settled for almost $800 million right before trial.
Hastert doesn't have a law named after him. There's the Hastert Rule, which is an informal rule that no bill should be brought before the House to vote on it unless it already has the support of the majority of the majority party.
Hastert was convicted of structuring withdrawals to avoid reporting requirements and making false statements. The charges themselves were not inherently about homosexuality, though it came about from him covering up his same-sex abuse of a minor, and the indictment didn't mention the sexual abuse, and his allocution under the plea deal didn't initially mention it. He did admit it under pressure from the judge, who seemed to start to lean against accepting his plea without him admitting to the molestation, for which he could not be charged because the statute of limitations had expired decades prior.
Hastert has never come out as gay. Most child molesters, even those who molest the same sex, never identify as homosexual.
Did anyone ask for this? Or will this be yet another AI product shoved down the throats of people that don't want it?
Well that's a different, and entirely solvable, problem.
Hoist the colors, ye scallywag!
https://plasma-bigscreen.org/g...
Unfortunately it doesn't appear to be a drop in replacement for smart TVs, but you can get most of the way there regardless.
I don't trust any smartTV providers. LG may be the target of this story, but I'm sure all of them are guilty of this to various degrees.
Number 7 according to Car & Driver, which I think is much more trustworthy than whatever "Wealthy Driver" is. The Car & Driver list is also applies to 2025 rather than 2023.
I mean, good for them for taking this step. Should extend it through highschool, but the root cause of the problems they're facing isn't AI, it's old fashion real-human stupidity making critical education decisions.
If caught early enough, you can make lifestyle changes which dramatically impact the course of the disease.
Of course, there's nothing stopping you from making these changes now.
Diet, exercise, get off your screens and get some sunshine is always good medical advice.
Laughs in Californian.
It's not a remotely level playing field. One soldier who took part in the Venezuela raid basically had orders in hand when he placed multiple bets on the timing of the raid, netting a ton of money. There have been many other examples of inside information being used to stack the odds.
Unless you're a C-level employee, specifically working in M&A, or maybe as the lead on a truly revolutionary new product (no, your company's Facebook wannabe or thinly disguised open source ripoff ain't it) - You have no insider information to trade on. Sincere belief that your employer's cool new toys are going to change the world ain't it - every company has cool new toys in the pipeline, and most of them are going to flop or at best be just another branded widget.
This is absolutely not true. There are plenty of people in the financial side of a business that have information that is material but non-public, and trading based on that knowledge is illegal, including sudden cuts in spending, audit results prior to publication, and more. HR will be aware of major layoffs. Facilities might be aware of impending site closures before they're announced. All these things can be used for insider trading.
Lower-level people aren't usually pursued because they're small enough to fly under the radar. But that doesn't mean it's not illegal, and it doesn't mean it never happens.
As technology improves, the customer experience gets worse.
It's been that way for at least 15 years, probably longer. It's the weirdest damn thing to watch; we have all this power and sophistication, but development houses can't seem to get out of their own way and make a product that doesn't A) Suck balls, and B) gets worse with each iteration.
MS is the most famous example of this, but they're hardly alone in this practice.
If the justification for a new law is "it's for the children", then the law is junk and the politicians behind it are trying to con you with something.
Every single time.
More accurate to say the bill of rights prohibits the government ( largely ) from certain actions.
Taking this a step further, who enforces "human rights" in dealing with businesses and citizens, if not the government? Who's to say that's a good thing anyway. Why can't I restrict access to me and mine from someone saying things I don't agree with? That's if you believe your "human rights" are equally and fairly applied, of course, which we all know they aren't.
No, the only sane approach to something like freedom of speech is to restrict the government and otherwise let people do as they will.
They already have a planned rotation. There will be two crews, rotating every four hours. This isn't unlike existing long-haul flights, except that instead of the crews rotating at the same time, they will be on two-hour offsets. One pilot will stay for the first four hours, the other for the first two hours. A replacement will swap in at two hours and stay through the sixth hour, and then the other will swap at four hours and stay through the eighth hour, and so on. Qantas said that this will apply to all flights of 20 hours or more.
Torque is cheap.
