From three months ago::

Surely this more recent story is much closer to the truth . . . the service struggling to "keep its relevance" is the one attaching itself to the other like a parasite.

Your best engineers will be AuDHD, and AuDHD folk don't do well in these sorts of synthetic tests.

I can code in 20+ languages for over 12 different OS', write code that's good enough for CERN to run for particle accelerator data collection for a decade, have accelerated systems by an order of magnitude by understanding the poem space better than their previous engineers, but I am abysmal at exam style settings.

The software industry is riddled with SEs who write abysmal code but can pass a coding test easily. They're the folk that you have always needed to reject but didn't because they ticked a box.

. . . I'm glad he got the ST longevity trend rather than the B5 one.

The DOD/DOW have been working on this for a while. They discovered, early on, that the device had a propensity to cause permanent nerve damage.

It's very unlikely the US have fixed that, as they'd largely sidelined the work as a failure. However, at 36%, Trump needs something he can call a win, no matter what the long-term consequences.

Statistical contortions might provide copium, but don't prove anything. I gave you a straightforward parameter median household income. Something economists have been using for generations. You had to cherry-pick — and your cherry is rotten, because you complained about the period of COVID lock-downs, much of it presided over by your champion.

And you provided no citations. No wonder, your moderation is so high :)

Also Trump is wrecking the economy and nobody wants to acknowledge that

Because it just is not true. Median household incomes in the US are just steadily rising (inflation-adjusted) since he took office in 2024.

that presented themselves as "male" were paid more per task and perceived as more "human-like" than their "female" counterparts

Those complaining loudest are the ones, who can't define the term "woman".

Say it isn't so....

I'm reading the "I say communists" as snark and I hope I'm interpreting that correctly. However, I do find it rather interesting that while we decry Chinese politics winning out in the AI race, we are still faced with a very real possibility that we would have to shift to substantial universal income for our own society (read, socialism or communism) as there will be little to no paying jobs remaining once AI is in full swing.

I never thought of the AI box experiment as an entirely theoretical thought exercise, but since we seem to have put LLMs on the internet as soon as we were the least bit capable, there never was a meaningful "box" in the first place.

...Modern ejector seats cause spinal injuries from which full recovery is "unusual". Smashing the spines of pilots might not be the most effective way to boost morale.

$22,000 per hour. The F35 will be nearer $42,000 per hour. These are under-estimates, as they do not include price hikes, crashes that close businesses, crashing into businesses, crashing into heavily-populated sports centres, etc.

So why haven't the AI companies been charged under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act?

One model going down is happenstance, two — a coincidence, the third one — it's enemy action.

— James Bond

So Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are commonly used in image generation to help steer an AI model to create more accurate results. Seems like Open AI needs to create Operational Adversarial Models. But now it almost feels like we're stepping into the concept of the machines in the Matrix where different machines cross check each. Agent Smith?