Comment Re:People here want H1-B reform, right? (Score 1, Offtopic) 223
For years people here on Slashdot have complained about H1-B abuse and the need to fix the program abuses that allowed companies to use it to cut costs and lay off Americans. So are you happy they are tightening the program, focusing it on experienced hires, and raising the cost to employers? Or is it bad because Trump?
If you are a nurse, you will resent the US importing nurses. If you are a brick layer, you will resent imported bricklayers. Ditto truck drivers, etc. of course, these policies tend not to effect those at the very top, and trust fund kids never really need to worry about starving or going homeless, so it tends to break down along the usual privileged/working people lines.
Points of view always come down to self-interest, and as a person who grew up very poor, never went to college, but taught myself to code ⦠Iâ(TM)ve done okay over the years, but employers markets when competition is high has always been harder for me, because most of the H1Bs I compete with have masters degrees. And while there are some exceptions, I have worked with some really bright Indian workers, many were pushed into the field by their parents who mandated that they become doctors, lawyers, or programmers, and are not all that into it outside of the income. It is very hard to self-assess without being biased, so this is merely my flawed opinion, but the large majority, despite their far better formal education, do not feel significantly more skilled than myself.
What they cannot do, however, is change jobs easily or make demands, so big corporations have developed a preference for them, and they at times make this clear. For instance, I worked at one very large company that you all know, and one day, out of the blue, they mandated that all workers have a passport. My job required no travel. They claimed that this was for security.
Well, a passport is something that one hundred percent of H1Bs have, while only something only 45% of citizens have. The deadline to get one wasnâ(TM)t very long, but it was not the end of the world. Just an inconvenience for many, and what, a hundred and fifty bucks or so.
In addition, though, Indian works got extra time off, especially in the fall for travel back to India for that holiday. They basically got an extra month off that citizens did not get. Then there were the oncalls for things related to the government that required citizenship to work on, meaning Oncallâ(TM)s for citizens came around far more frequently, no pay differential though.
Again, not a huge deal but we did lose people, and the company was fine with it, especially if they were citizens. Best of all, H1Bs pose not threat to unionization. Itâ(TM)s always American rabble rousers.
So, is H1B a benefit to CEOs, shareholders, executives, their children, and people in their general socioeconomic class? Absolutely. Is it a detriment to workers? Of course. I am uneducated and even I understand how supply and demand affects value. If you increase the supply of people like me, the value of people like me goes down. So unless I am financially secure with a support lifeline, I will likely oppose H1B visas, even if I say the opposite to avoid the insults that people will hurl at me.
To argue that people who oppose their own devaluation are evil, is evil itself, IMHO.
But to the question about being happy about it, then no, no I am not. Not yet at least and likely not ever. Anytime the government proposes something that will ostensibly benefit me, it usually does not. It gets watered down with loopholes placed all over the place, and becomes just a -olitical mirage. I mean did CAN SPAM , can SPAM?
So, I am very skeptical, because the US government has never been interested in helping me or people like me, and they have had this lack of interest for so long, that I am completely unable to imagine it ever changing.
It may be a great political football for everyone to wring their hands over, but there is far too much interest, power, and money aimed at preserving the status-quo for it to ever change. Rather, it is just another dividing point for the masses to quibble over thus ensuring that something like Occupy never, ever happens again.
I assume most of you know that was the genesis of the supposed polarization. Everyone was eyeballing the 1 percent as the source of most evils, Brexit won, Trump won, then BAM, out of nowhere gender identity was the most important thing to happen to anyone, and it was very much not an organic hysteria.
Since then, it has been moral panic after moral panic, and the only winners have been the ruling class.
This is just another one.