The answer is quite simple: human experience. And, not having all our eggs in the same basket.

As for the first part: you can look at wonderful pictures of Saturn or Jupiter, as taken by Hubble, JWST or one of the probes that went there. You can also look at these planets, using your own eyes, through a telescope. Pictures are nice, but that live view is something totally different. Same if you look at a cloud cover from above vs. the pictures you can get from a drone. Space exploration goes far beyond pretty views, obviously.

For the second part: of course we're, for now, still far away from being able to survive off Earth without resupply. But we really should work on that, if we want to have a future. If only because we know for a fact that Earth will become unlivable - maybe not through our own foolish actions, but latest when the sun has burnt enough of its hydrogen and starts changing its structure. I know long-term planning isn't everybody's thing, but there are people thinking that far ahead.

1) Robotic probes. To explore "far away" stuff, there is, for now, no reasonable alternative.

2) Manned missions to the Moon, later to near-Earth asteroids, including a permanent habitat.
The reasoning being, unlike for the ISS in Earth orbit, there are local resources to be used,
and these habitats would be close enough for help from Earth if things go sideways.

Once we've learned how to do #2 properly, we can go on to places farther away, such as Mars.

You've got to learn to walk before you run.

I've been using (K)Ubuntu for a very long while - maybe 15-20 years (Linux user since about 1995). I recently upgraded my desktop from Kubuntu 24.04 LTS to "normal" 25.04. Note that I was already quite unhappy with those effing snaps of Firefox and Thunderbird - seriously, I hate being regularly warned about having to close a program for an update, when I expect to do that precisely for the moments I do an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade. Now, it looks like even things like graphics don't work properly any more, as I get to see spurious horizontal lines depending on my mouse clicks. Seriously? This is sooo basic stuff. Chances are I'll bite the bullet and reinstall, switching back to the base of Ubuntu, i.e. Debian GNU/Linux. Unless I move straight over to Devuan, for that matter. Now get off my lawn.

Even the boast of "fastest car, period" is BS. The ThrustSSC achieved a speed of 1,228 km/h (763 mph), breaking the sound barrier.

There's machines out there which actually do have TPM, but it's turned off via BIOS. How many people will throw away a perfectly good machine just because they don't know they could turn on TPM in the BIOS?

As for the commute - I live in a place lucky to have free (i.e. paid from the taxes) public transport. Public transport is also much more comfortable and hassle-free than driving and finding a parking space. Those "remote" days do cut down on the pretty horrific traffic on the roads, which in turn makes for less CO2 emissions.

Yes, from the employer's view, they can't cut down on office space as much, and they need to provide the means for remote work. For the worker, yes, they need to be close enough by the office. Working from abroad is problematic in that if it's more than a certain amount of days / year, it changes taxation entirely (taxation in the country of residence instead of the country where the office is), which can be quite penalizing.

The rules here where I work (IT, but it's the same for other office workers): you have a maximum of 2 days / week of remote work. The rest of the time, you come into the office. Also, remote work needs to be requested in advance and needs to be approved by the team leader (pure formality). When at the office, you badge in and out using your personal badge, so it's very easy to track who's in and who's not. If the rules are not followed, you'll get a ruffle from HR.

The reasons for mandating time at the office are obvious, e.g. being available for meetings, seeing the rest of the team, so the team as such can properly work together (teams with a good routine were a key factor for keeping things running smoothly and efficiently during Covid lockdown with quasi 100% remote work, with only minimal staff on-site). We went from 100% home office during lockdown to a minimum of 2 days / week at the office and on to the current ruleset, which seems to hold for good.

I know other places around here are much more strict with remote work, where you can't change your schedule short-term, or it's only a single day of home office. I feel those employers still haven't measured the positive impacts of home office. Otoh, I don't understand this "remote only" thing that seems to be described. Apparently there's even entire recruitment processes without any physical interaction? Around here, that's pretty much unthinkable. I feel I'm blessed with the proper middle ground, best of both worlds. From the article text, it seems the author of this book also hasn't heard of "middle ground". It isn't all or nothing, or at least, it shouldn't be.

If you need to troll, please get the basics right. It's called Lambda CDM - CDM for cold dark matter. Check here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model.

There is such a thing as a hands-free kit. Fix that phone someplace accessible with such a kit, and you're good to go. But hold it to your ear for phoning, and you'll get fined. At least, that's pretty much it for most, if not all of Europe.

Those are claims. What's the actual reality of the facts?

Hartmut Zohm, a german plasma physicist who's deep into fusion research, regularly provides updates on the status of fusion research. While not saying it in so many words, he is quite clearly giving impression that the claims by all those fusion startups are overly optimistic and basically a "give me all your venture money" call. They may have specific partial solutions for certain problems, but are nowhere near a full-scale operation.

That's certainly right, but only up to a point. When you're e.g. running a mainframe platform and losing the last people that still know it, and all the code running there, to retirement, and even the maker of that (non-IBM) platform obviously has less and less people who know how to keep that platform running, it's definitely time to move on. Unlike Elon / DOGE want to make you believe, no, it's not a 5 month job to migrate, even 5 years won't suffice to do it properly. It's not simply about knowing COBOL.

You're obviously joking, but...

With the way Trump is alienating the classic US allies, they are indeed turning away from everything american. We've seen the signs in Canada, e.g. with US Whisky being pulled from the shelves, I also see it over here in Europe. Now, both Apple and MS are american too, so they'll also end up in the crosshairs. I do see more GNU/Linux in our future - and I'll say, good riddance for the proprietary vendors.

I can see Germany retracting the contract for F35 in favour of Eurofighters, Tesla sales have already cratered, Trump may want to activate the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline, but no-one in their right minds will buy russian gas coming through there. And that's only a very small part of what's happening. Face it, Trump is running the US right into the ground - it doesn't even matter whether he actually is a russian agent "Krasnov" or not, the result is the same.

I guess you missed the news about the one house that's still standing amid the smoking ruins of its neighbors... yes, brick & mortar, specifically designed to be earthquake-proof, and obviously much less flammable than classic constructions.
You have the winner right there.

My own biggest gripe with 11 is the "group by" in windows explorer and file dialogs. Who the f* at MS thought it would be a good idea to have such a thing turned on by default and no setting anywhere to turn it off globally? That's an extreme time-waster.

Yeah, there is a third-party "WinSetView" tool that does the trick, but seriously?

Good thing I don't need to use 11 much, I've been mostly on GNU/Linux including desktop since 1995 - yay, 30 years now!

"x64-only Itanium line" - NO! That was called IA64. It had nothing to do with x86, relied heavily on compiler optimization for decent performance, and was to provide compatibility to x86 using emulation only.

I do recall an early IA64 system with a Linux distro (probably RedHat) on there, it was godawfully slow compared to the x86 systems we were used to, let alone Alpha systems. Much of that slowness was probably due to suboptimal optimizations, but still... I'm not unhappy I never saw another IA64 system, and curse the decision to discontinue Alpha in favor of Itanic.Then again, some of those former DEC engineers working on Alpha ended up with AMD and created x86-64.