Wasn't there enough on this subject documented in BSG? Do Cylons have a soul, a god?

Vacuum energy has been known for quite a while and has been observed experimentally. In the Wikipedia article there's a reference to Arthur C. Clarke's Songs of Distant Earth, where he referenced actual papers. Smashing protons together in colliders is always done in vacuum, as otherwise they'd collide with the particles from gases and thus not achieve the high energies wanted, among other issues. This writer doesn't seem to have much of a grasp of physics.

What are you talking about? I've been running e.g. civctp for Linux, unmodified, for at least 25 years, over a number of different distros. No issues there.
I've been running Linux on the desktop since 1995.

If I see any issues, it's bullshit like snap or systemd-resolved that ruins my desktop experience because snap wants updates when it inconveniences me, or because systemd-resolved just craps out and I have to restart the service. And that's on me because I didn't switch away from my current Kubuntu just yet, to go back to a less tainted distro.

Allegedly, sure. Because most of those startups tend to have pretty websites, ask for loads of money, and don't make much sense in the way of science and technology. If I were in risky investments, my BS detector would scream "don't touch this". There are very few startups that have even a small area of expertise where they might actually have something, but they remain very far from an actual power plant.

My bet would be to continue with the more promising magnetic confinement research projects, which are Stellarators (e.g. Wendelstein 7-X) and Tokamaks (e.g. ITER) - certainly no NIF-style stuff (that's for researching nuclear explosions, not producing power). When those get closer to the goal, then going private might start making sense.

No, it is clearly the US that are shutting the doors. Very obviously, the Trump administration wants to go it alone - either others accept extortionous terms (why should they?) or nothing. Forget a fair deal. Ok, then don't be surprised if the rest of the world gives the US the middle finger. All the US has going for themselves is momentum, and that's quickly drying up. Trust is long gone, good luck to get it back within our lifetimes.

Excellent job agent Krasnov is doing for his master.

In my eyes, one of the main issues pretty much all automakers have is that they are selling cars that don't really fit what their customers actually want. Where have the small cars gone? Where have the family vans gone? Where are the simple, no frills cars? Which customer actually wants anything like automated driving, which they seem to strive for? Any features requiring some sort of subscription? Why oh why must almost every new car be a SUV?

For VW, in the european markets, an example of a car dearly missed is the Sharan - a family van with sliding rear doors. It fits 2 adults, 3 kids (including special kid's seats), the family dog and the luggage for the holidays. Frills if you actually wanted them, but not required. They were selling like hotcakes. For used Sharans, prices have gone sky-high, as they have an excellent - well merited - reputation. But VW decided not to build them any more. There is no replacement in sight. The Buzz is an electric bus, but not a family van. The Caddy, while nice enough, is still a glorified, smaller delivery van. The ID.7 looks like a nice electric replacement for the Passat, but won't fit the 3 kids with their seats, as pretty much none of any maker's station wagons nor SUVs do.

Ford discontinued their well-selling Fiesta, Focus, S-Max, Galaxy for instance. They try to sell SUVs, and it looks like they are pretty much disappearing from the market.

Instead of running after fads and only trying to maximize their profits, thus only tending to the high-margin categories, maybe all these automakers should try to listen to what people actually want to buy, so they can actually sell numbers.

Note: going electric is not the problem. Only selling hugely expensive, over-equipped, partially unreliable cars (software!) is a problem, though.

If you think of "valar morghulis", the combination with "atomics" sure gets scary...

The answer is quite simple: human experience. And, not having all our eggs in the same basket.

As for the first part: you can look at wonderful pictures of Saturn or Jupiter, as taken by Hubble, JWST or one of the probes that went there. You can also look at these planets, using your own eyes, through a telescope. Pictures are nice, but that live view is something totally different. Same if you look at a cloud cover from above vs. the pictures you can get from a drone. Space exploration goes far beyond pretty views, obviously.

For the second part: of course we're, for now, still far away from being able to survive off Earth without resupply. But we really should work on that, if we want to have a future. If only because we know for a fact that Earth will become unlivable - maybe not through our own foolish actions, but latest when the sun has burnt enough of its hydrogen and starts changing its structure. I know long-term planning isn't everybody's thing, but there are people thinking that far ahead.

1) Robotic probes. To explore "far away" stuff, there is, for now, no reasonable alternative.

2) Manned missions to the Moon, later to near-Earth asteroids, including a permanent habitat.
The reasoning being, unlike for the ISS in Earth orbit, there are local resources to be used,
and these habitats would be close enough for help from Earth if things go sideways.

Once we've learned how to do #2 properly, we can go on to places farther away, such as Mars.

You've got to learn to walk before you run.

I've been using (K)Ubuntu for a very long while - maybe 15-20 years (Linux user since about 1995). I recently upgraded my desktop from Kubuntu 24.04 LTS to "normal" 25.04. Note that I was already quite unhappy with those effing snaps of Firefox and Thunderbird - seriously, I hate being regularly warned about having to close a program for an update, when I expect to do that precisely for the moments I do an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade. Now, it looks like even things like graphics don't work properly any more, as I get to see spurious horizontal lines depending on my mouse clicks. Seriously? This is sooo basic stuff. Chances are I'll bite the bullet and reinstall, switching back to the base of Ubuntu, i.e. Debian GNU/Linux. Unless I move straight over to Devuan, for that matter. Now get off my lawn.

Even the boast of "fastest car, period" is BS. The ThrustSSC achieved a speed of 1,228 km/h (763 mph), breaking the sound barrier.

There's machines out there which actually do have TPM, but it's turned off via BIOS. How many people will throw away a perfectly good machine just because they don't know they could turn on TPM in the BIOS?

As for the commute - I live in a place lucky to have free (i.e. paid from the taxes) public transport. Public transport is also much more comfortable and hassle-free than driving and finding a parking space. Those "remote" days do cut down on the pretty horrific traffic on the roads, which in turn makes for less CO2 emissions.

Yes, from the employer's view, they can't cut down on office space as much, and they need to provide the means for remote work. For the worker, yes, they need to be close enough by the office. Working from abroad is problematic in that if it's more than a certain amount of days / year, it changes taxation entirely (taxation in the country of residence instead of the country where the office is), which can be quite penalizing.

The rules here where I work (IT, but it's the same for other office workers): you have a maximum of 2 days / week of remote work. The rest of the time, you come into the office. Also, remote work needs to be requested in advance and needs to be approved by the team leader (pure formality). When at the office, you badge in and out using your personal badge, so it's very easy to track who's in and who's not. If the rules are not followed, you'll get a ruffle from HR.

The reasons for mandating time at the office are obvious, e.g. being available for meetings, seeing the rest of the team, so the team as such can properly work together (teams with a good routine were a key factor for keeping things running smoothly and efficiently during Covid lockdown with quasi 100% remote work, with only minimal staff on-site). We went from 100% home office during lockdown to a minimum of 2 days / week at the office and on to the current ruleset, which seems to hold for good.

I know other places around here are much more strict with remote work, where you can't change your schedule short-term, or it's only a single day of home office. I feel those employers still haven't measured the positive impacts of home office. Otoh, I don't understand this "remote only" thing that seems to be described. Apparently there's even entire recruitment processes without any physical interaction? Around here, that's pretty much unthinkable. I feel I'm blessed with the proper middle ground, best of both worlds. From the article text, it seems the author of this book also hasn't heard of "middle ground". It isn't all or nothing, or at least, it shouldn't be.

If you need to troll, please get the basics right. It's called Lambda CDM - CDM for cold dark matter. Check here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model.