Dario Amodei, Anthropic CEO, has been campaigning for government regulation. Only last week, he was putting out statements that we need an AI pause. He keeps saying how dangerous his own products are and how likely they are to create mass unemployment. Well, now he has his government regulation and he has his own personal pause. Hopefully, this will teach him why many are sceptical of asking governments to regulate against innovation.

Anthropic is led by AI doomers and are always asking for ways to save the world from their own products. Anthropic have been campaigning for years to get government regulation in place in the full knowledge that the head of the US state is Donald J. Trump. Only last week, Anthropic were putting out statements that they want a pause on AI development. Now they have the regulation they wanted and they have the pause they wanted. Let's see how they like it.

I clicked on the link, which appeared to be a BBC story, and then filled in the form including my phone number for more information. Then I saw it was a scam and bailed. Now I get 2 or 3 phone calls from the scammers every day, all from local phone numbers, but all guys with Indian accents so they are spoofing the numbers. I always answer, never speak and just let them hang there a few minutes. The annoyance is that they will sell my number to other scammers so this phone number is probably blighted for life now.

I rent out a house in England and the tenant had a (reasonable) complaint. She emailed 3000 words to the managing agent. The agent sent her a 2000 word reply. This bounced back and forth a bit with each sending long emails with bullet points and the like. My guess is that both of them were using ChatGPT both to compose their own emails and to summarise the replies they got.

In frustration, she phoned me to complain and got what she wanted in less than 60 seconds. In my opinion, we will see much more examples like this where AI is reducing efficiency and lowering productivity.

It took 18 years of pointless clicking for bureaucrats to finally notice that they chose the worst implementation possible of cookie control.

I tried that prompt and got the correct answer: "The challenge is essentially impossible unless you use a different naming system (e.g., Roman numerals or digit strings)."

It's strange how these systems give one person slop and another the correct results from the exact same prompts.

iPhones from Indian and Vietnamese factories are subject to a 10% tariff while those from Chinese factories are at 125%. How can they set a retail price?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Chinese AI firms have full access to the data these artists want to "protect." The stupid law they want to enact will only make a UK based AI inductry even less likely.

This was most definitely not the first such case. Blizzard sued us to close down Honorbuddy and Demonbuddy, bots for WoW and D3 saying that using their games to develop our bots was breach of copyright. We lost over $10 million in 2018 and were wiped out.

When I try it, ChatGPT says "I'm sorry, but I can't provide verbatim excerpts from copyrighted texts. "The Dark Tower" is a series of novels written by Stephen King, and the opening sentence of a specific book within the series might be considered copyrighted material. However, I can provide a summary or answer any questions you might have about the series. Let me know if there's anything else I can assist you with!"

Why would you lie about such an easily checked thing?

Meta is releasing powerful open source LLMs and its trainign data. These are not quite at ChatGPT4 levels but are very good. This means all efforts to control the use of AI are sort of pointless.

This reminds me of a weird viral set of lies that circulated before the UK election in 2019.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/dec/10/woman-says-account-hacked-to-post-fake-story-about-hospital-boy

The initial lie was just some random person making stuff up. But 1000s of people repeated the lie by copy/pasting the text. Hundreds of thousands retweeted it. The lie went viral. No amount of fact checking made any difference and it became an election issue.

The only explanation I can think of is that huge numbers of people actively prefer stories that match their political preferences and if reality won't provide the facts to support these stories, they will happily accept fiction and righteously lie in order to support those political preferences.