CAPTCHA is a fundamentally broken system these days and is doing little to stop bots.

To be fair, owners of old accounts would barely recognise any of these sites anymore, so maybe ask if you really need someone to speak for you, or you would instead be begging for a convenient excuse to leave a dying spam filled platform behind.

Actually it explicitly isn't, with the exception of channels dedicated to just showing one show TV has historically always contained content to specific hour or half our periods, broken up by advertisements, and often a full week between serialised episodes.

Why? They are unable to use it responsibly. We actively censor children all the time, it's part of the recognition that they are still in fact children.

Spotted the psychopath. Personally I find your post hurt my feelings. An ICBM is enroute to your house for ethical reasons, purely self defense of course, I don't like my feelings hurt.

Depends, are those forums moderated?

If you can name a car that has no door key, you'll have found an edge case in the industry. Virtually all of them have a key hidden in the fob.

I think the label is legit. "Very few" may not be correct in absolute numbers, but in terms of player hours and popularity it really is. If you want to play some less popular games then sure you'll be fine, but looking at the list the red ones seem to also be the who's who of popular online titles.

Nothing next, we already achieved what we wanted, triggering the Musk worshipers.

Cybertrucks maybe.

Yeah, lots of them. I don't know what you mean by "civilian grade" but titanium alloys, and ceramic composites can be bought openly by anyone. Materials are not really that restricted in the grand scheme of things.

If they are cheap they don't need to work reliably.

But we are talking about the Constitutional definition, so that is irrelevant. Speaking of the Constitution, have a look at Article 1 Section 8 Clause 16: "Congress governs the militia, while the states retain the authority to appoint officers and train the militia based on congressional regulations."

And yet you're postulating something that effectively is not heard of in the auto industry. Not having the latest shiny != not being feature complete. You're making up scenarios which don't exist to help bolster an argument that isn't standing on its own.

Google is not in control of that. Android Automotive updates need to be customised and pushed out by the car manufacturer. I've seen a notification to get an update pushed maybe twice since I've owned it, and none of them have had any significant feature changes.

No they aren't. There's zero cars on the market that operate as a thin client for the phone. No one would buy a car that can't do the basics without a phone, they are already duplicating everything as it is. All this does is offload things to Google that the manufacturer no longer needs to do.

It's objectively cheaper which is why quite a lot of manufacturers have moved to it already (this product has existed for 9 years already).

No you misunderstood the comment. The comment was that rather having to create a complete custom infotainment system witten from the ground up running on something like QNX, their responsibility is ultimately reduced to drawing a pretty UI on top of an App / OS that Google provide. It's the difference between writing your own Browser, or writing a webpage in HTML (the latter, being your branding).

There is no sharing of branding other than you maybe recognising the maps interface. The only place I see a Google logo in my car (I have Android Automotive) is in the Settings > About > and seeing two different privacy statements. There's no Google branding anywhere, again the car manufacturer is entirely responsible for the interface display (including custom colouring in Google supplied apps like Google Maps which matchs the rest of the car's interface).