There's a difference between filling a remote job, with someone who has brains, and filling a remote job with someone who can simply type. If I had a job to fill that could be done out of Hyderabad I'd call a world class place like Meta (yes this is a joke) and get their AI to do it instead (this part is not a joke).

The other day I saw a speech by Donald Trump about oil prices where he said (direct quote) "I couldn't care less". Let the fact that Donald J Trump, infamously bad at speaking and incoherent at the best of times, knows how to use that phrase better than you do sink in for a second.

Unemployment figures disagree. As do job opening figures, which while they are down over the past 2 years they are still higher than at any point in the decade prior to the COVID pandemic.

People are changing jobs constantly. If you see some significant trend of people who don't rebel then it's a feature of your specific employer, not one in the wider industry.

How much of it have you looked at? With over 9500 feature films and over 1100 new TV serials being produced each year, I'm guessing your problem is that you only look at crap rather than having performed an assessment of available entertainment.

There's lots of truly awesome stuff out there both TV and cinema. Just branch out beyond what you seen plastered on a billboard by Warner Bros.

It's even more illegal in Germany. No really, not just a meme. If AI is a tool as Meta says, then the AI chatbot that bypasses access protections is a tool, which makes it a hacking tool under Section 202c of the German Criminal Code. It is a criminal offense to produce, sell, or distribute software intended to circumvent data protection.

Understatement. Studies on agrivoltaics have shown almost universal benefits to crop yields. It's not a case of something can "still" happen, it's a case of in some situations it may actually produce a tangible improvement.

Perfect demonstration. Your biased by what you know. You've held 200kV @100A in your hand and you're commenting on communities who have never even seen 3ph power and saying something is or isn't suitable for them.

You're living outside of the reality of this conversation.

You know Trump is on the wrong side of an argument when...

Aborting is standard practice for such things for multiple reasons:
1. Regulatory / legal: Dealing with potential problem people in a source country is preferable to just telling the destination country: "Yo bruh we're bringing a terrorist over, can you pick him up so that we can go through a lengthy extradition process to get him back?"
2. Opsec: The "bomb" hadn't exploded yet. You don't know why it hadn't exploded. Maybe it was timer based. Maybe it was GPS coordinate based. Maybe the target was the airport at Palma de Mallorca. Maybe it's not designed to go off but to be smuggled into the destination country. All we know was the target wasn't New Jersey.
3. Liability: A united plane dealing with an American airport in America with passengers in American jurisdiction makes for less legal headaches than unloading passengers in a foreign country straight into the hands of police.

Were we terrified? By all accounts the passengers seemed annoyed by the entire ordeal, and the bureaucracy (corporate and regulatory) not terrified.

The teenager's parents didn't turn the plane around for a non-issue, so why would they be able to do that?

What do you mean law? Who has been charged? Who is in jail? What does any of this have to do with the law or constitution?

To what end (for the consumer)? NVIDIA is targeting a PC so they are targeting the most commonly used OS (Windows) which has a perfectly functioning ARM build + x86 emulation layer already.

There's a LOT more work in doing something with RiscV than ARM right now as the latter has proven itself in software support already.

For the same reason you're currently on Windows. With other OSes available for your CPU architecture clearly the architecture has nothing to do with your choice.