Comment Re:I thought we all knew those things where BS... (Score 2) 125
There's a reason they are not admissible as evidence.
... and also a reason polygraph they're still in business.
http://www.truthorlie.com/whopoly.html
http://criminologycareers.about.com/od/Forensic-Science-Careers/a/Polygraph-Examiner-Career-Profile.htm
Comment Pentatonic (Score 1) 111
Comment Re:Obama vetoes jobs (Score 4, Interesting) 437
The XL pipeline would provide only temporary jobs for the construction of the pipeline. It might require a few dozen permanent jobs for maintenance and other costs associated with any ongoing concern. Then again, the US firms (if any) charged with maintaining the pipeline once it's built may not hire anyone new for these roles.
I get the impression that you're joking, but it's more important than at any time in the past to correct false assertions: Most everyone has lost his sense of humor, and facts are routinely confused with personal or group truths. It will be more important to correct false assertions tomorrow -- why not procrastinate in order to ramp up the significance of your unfounded exaggerations?
Better suggestion for you -- from Len Grossman. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Comment Re:BS aside, is the K-XL a good thing or not? (Score 1) 437
Methinks the fix is in, whether it involves Tom Steyer or other interests who are only anti-this-pipeline.
FYI, my brother-in-law sells pipe for pipelines (and the SCADA to go with it). He says that sales have strictly increased since the pipeline was first publicized in 2008.
Comment Because the schools will need the extra $$ ... (Score 1) 107
John Carlyle: What is going on? Why has production stopped?
Foreman: He's been exposed.
John Carlyle: Don't. Don't breathe on me. Cover your mouth.
Foreman: I'm sorry, sir.
John Carlyle: Does his skin fall off or something? I don't want to replace the bedding. Just get him out.
Foreman: Yes, sir.
John Carlyle: Great. Thank you.
Comment Re:Let me be the first to say (Score 1) 107
And that's leaving ALEC out of the equation.
We know that Eternal September began in 1993. When did Eternal Balance Sheet begin, i.e., when did We The People start believing that anything not turning a profit must be shut down? Some things simply cost money, e.g., public schools, the Post Office,
Comment Re:only incorrectly device to kill humans? (Score 1) 335
Comment Re:Yawn ... (Score 1) 167
I agree that many have simply jumped onto the cloud bandwagon because it's new. Some cloud providers offer tertiary services atop their basic cloud, e.g. the things that end in "aaS" -- but those aren't cloud storage, just services/apps built on top of cloud storage.
In general, the understanding of what "cloud" really means in terms of actual use versus marketing is very cloudy. Recall that the first cloud was private and then made public for a low price -- and no one put critical data there besides the cloud's inventor. IMHO it was simply engineers moving between tech firms that caused the design to "migrate" back when the original cloud was simply replicated. Since then it's evolved; Amazon uses erasure encoding, Google's not telling, and who knows what's up with Azure? I, for one, see an obvious coincidence for a failure on Patch Tuesday.
Comment Re:LOL (Score 1) 182
The same design that prevents real-time communication also makes Freenet a lot more resilient.
... and durable.
Comment Re:Did they buy Sun for this? (Score 1) 206
Comment Re:Don't think this can be stopped (Score 2, Insightful) 321
Comment Re:The people lose again (Score 1) 323
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. ~the Declaration of Independence
Comment Re:Absurdly obvious (Score 1) 127
I remember a story about a guy who thought of dunking banana slices in chocolate and mixing them with banana flavoured ice cream. He showed this to some food company, which turned him down and then marketed it themselves. Many other examples abound. Maybe Robert Kearn's story (he patented his intermittent windscreen wiper design before approaching Ford, then Chrysler) is a better context for the question: Who was first to market? The inventor who tried to market to the corporation, or the corporation that stole the idea and marketed it to genpop?
Even if the good guys win -- whomever the good guys are, for you, in this squabble -- regulatory agencies in these United States are crack whores, fellating the same corporations that the legislature has put in charge. The rules are for show. Gives a whole new meaning to money talks, bullshit walks when the regulations are widely known to be unenforced, even unenforceable.
That, by the way, is the definition of corruption, i.e., the opposite of integrity. Integrity is much more than some soporific ideal about what is right. It's about strength, and durability. What is the integrity of the chair you're sitting in right now?