Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:This is Nuts! (Score 1) 108

That's a logical explanation, and his toddler-like mind is inadequate enough to believe it, but there are some other good ones. For example, this is an attack on our country motivated by the carrot of Russian funding (Donnie Dipshit's even dumber kids told us about it) and the stick of Russian release of incontrovertible video evidence he rapes kids, which I would bet good money exists.

Comment Re:Ocean Monitoring is Commercial Exercise. (Score 1) 108

From what I see here government programs are never allowed to die if anyone has their congressman's phone number and a x account of a journalist.

From what you see where? Slashdot? There's a wider world out there.

What I do know is remote sensing from very cheap platforms that float in the ocean and report in via starlink or other cheaply avaialbe platform are part of the past 20 year changeover to moving to moving to cheap disposable platforms

You've got to MOVE IT MOVE IT
MOVE IT!

Send programs to commercial weather companies, their are many

Oh, please do get fucked, Ivan.

Comment Re:shit world (Score 1) 108

Is that worse than a rapist and child molester? Those didn't matter to you, now terrorist does?

All of those things matter to me, but:
1) A lot of his base is too stupid to believe it and
2) Terrorism can affect a whole lot more people, so it is actually more serious. This is not in any way to downplay the import of Cheeto Benito being a rapist and child molester, which are obviously serious enough crimes to justify action, and not in any way to justify maggots not caring about rape.

Comment Re:Acting like Broadcom (Score 1) 134

So if I start a company, sell you some software and then go out a business, then what?

The obvious fix is to require that a version with no DRM be held in escrow and released if your company sinks, with prison time for execs if it doesn't work so that it actually gets tested. This would actually work, so it won't be implemented.

Comment Re:D.o.g.e. (Score 2) 108

almost half of Americans have totally disengaged at this point and the other half believes themselves so powerless that (to use a Douglas Adamsism) they're only concerned with preventing the wrong lizard from being elected.

We are powerless to fix the problem by voting while the lazy cowards refuse to vote.

But we are also powerless to fix the problem with revolt while half of the people willing to do something want to do something shit.

Comment Re:another personal assistant? (Score 1) 20

Who wants an "AI Autopilot" to perform actions in their name? Even if 25 years, if AI is so good that it's flawless, people still will be double-checking it.

If AI were flawless, then it would have a reputation for that, and people would trust it. As it is, its reputation is very bad, and a lot of people still do. If it were somehow flawless, then I would want it, but there's not even a concept of a plan of how to get from here to there.

Comment uh no (Score 5, Insightful) 20

"Autopilots stay active in the background, understand how work gets done across your apps and systems, and take action without needing to be prompted each time," said Omar Shahine"

Actual autopilots require constant oversight, whether you're on a yacht looking or for shipping containers, or in a plane watching for mountains. That's why it's a good name for Tesla's Almost Self Driving misfeature. On that basis it's actually sort of a good name for this, in that so will these AI agents, though they won't be getting it.

If they wanted to give an air of confidence, though, they would have named it more cleverly than this, and without using a name already in common use for a semi related product.

I suggest general operating LLM enterprise management, or GOLEM ;)

Slashdot Top Deals

My idea of roughing it turning the air conditioner too low.

Working...