The worst part isn't even whether or not Eats / Doordash suck (and make no mistake, they do) at their core purpose - It's that virtually every restaurant traditionally known for delivering has realized they can cut that nonsense right out of the budget and just push everyone to use a third-party delivery service at the customer's expense.

I know I'm going to sound like a cranky old man here, but once upon a time, food delivery was a sweet job for a late teen / early 20-something - Drive around town rather than being stuck in a kitchen, busting their butts to get the food to you while it was still warm, and were thrilled to get tipped a five. Now, if you only tip these professional "food ransom services" a twenty, you can expect to scrape your food off the garage roof and be named-and-shamed on IG for being such an insufferable asshole as to not pay more for the delivery than the food. And even if you tip "enough" to avoid the wrath of your driver, it's guaranteed to be late, cold, and in way too many cases to be coincidental, missing a few fries / nuggets / whatever. Go ahead and complain, and they'll just ban both the driver and the customer, and good luck getting a refund.

But hey, I have nothing to complain about since I live more than 10 minutes outside a city core, nobody will accept the delivery anyway.

Oh, goody, the website selling our licenses is down. Whelp, toothpaste back in the tube, we can all rest easy knowing that the day is saved!

Of course, the next obvious step if they can't sell them is to simply release the entire batch into the wild. And how dare any of you think this might somehow be the fault of sweet innocent idscan.net for inadequately protecting the highly sensitive data they were grudgingly entrusted with in the first place.

We need a hell of a lot more CEOs in prison, and we need any politicians that requires / supports / allows this bullshit to join them. Of course, absolutely none of that is going to happen because Joe Sixpack has zero clue any of this is going on; and even if he somehow catches wind of it from a Facebook meme, oh well, it's just one more breach, who cares, he gets notices of those on a monthly basis and has been intentionally trained to treat them as junk mail.

Need? There are lots of things you don't "need". But this seems like something that could legitimately improve my oral hygiene because -- like most people, I suspect -- I don't floss nearly as often as I should. Having it integrated into the brushing process would mean I do it 2-3 times per day, rather than once every few days. Is that worth $500? I guess it depends on how important $500 is to you. I'm not very price-sensitive and I am very lazy.

I'll wait until these have been available for a while and see what the reviews look like... but if the reviews are positive I'd say there's about a 95% chance I'll buy one.

I have one, and I don't use it enough. It takes time and effort to fill, use and clean up. Did I mention I'm lazy?

The notion that democracy and capitalism are innately incompatible is rather interesting, given that every long-running democracy has a predominantly capitalist economy. There has never been a durable multiparty democracy with a state-owned or centrally-planned economy. Not one! There are several examples of non-democratic nations with capitalist economies, but the complete lack of any successful non-capitalist democracy argues pretty strongly that capitalism is a necessary (though not sufficient) prerequisite for a healthy democracy, which is the opposite of incompatibility.

I did note that you attached the qualifier "unfettered", but has there ever been an example of unfettered capitalism? I'm not aware of one, and it seems fundamentally impossible. Capitalism requires a state to enforce property rights and contract law, and it's hard to think how any state could exist that does those things but doesn't also impose some regulation. If by "unfettered" you mean "lightly regulated" rather than the literal meaning of the word, then it becomes a question of degree but democracies have gone through many cycles of liberalizing and regulating without ceasing to be democracies.

No, in fact most attempts at democratic socialism have been entered peacefully. They tend to begin by election of a socialist leader with enough support to begin nationalizing all or most industry. Examples include the Allende regime in Chile, India's government for much of the latter half of the 20th century, Sweden's Meidner Plan, Venezuela (Chavez' second attempt; his first try was a coup but then he was elected), etc.

Socialist revolutions almost always install non-democratic regimes, though many claimed to be democratic (e.g. the USSR had decades of elections in which every race had only a single candidate, chosen by the nomenklatura).

Fine, we'll do this the tedious way, since you Meta/etc shills are happy to prove they're incapable of inductive reasoning.

Foreign scammers do not care about the law. Social media CEOs play fast-and-loose with the law and consider fines just a cost of doing business. Governments consider themselves above the law. The "good guys" didn't need this law in the first place.

"You may not use this service unless you're 13 or over" - Poof, every 12YO is suddenly 35. See the problem with your hypothesis?

I know this will come as a shock to many, but porn sites aren't the problem here, merely the lowest hanging "for duh kidz!!1!" excuse available to push these adult-privacy atrocities through - If anything, they tend to be some of the best actors in this situation, if only because they're the most closely watched by puritanical assholes. I trust PornHub far more than I trust Twitter, and I trust Twitter far more than anything ending in .ru, .il, or .in.

Sounds an awfully lot like you're agreeing with me here. Are you referring to a specific situation you'd like to cite?

To the best of my knowledge, gambling requires having some way to pay. Kids aren't laundering birthday cash from grandma so they can place a trifecta on the ponies, dude. Meanwhile, this will have zero effect on gambler-in-training gatchas that let kids bet on loot boxes via Play / iTunes gift cards.

Pbpbpbttttt! I know you are but what am I?
Christ you trolls are tiresome.

They did make as good an attempt as anyone... but still had to restrict emigration to prevent their population fleeing the workers' paradise.

Fair, many people do use the term imprecisely.

I doubt it. Which is why the cheaper devices being discussed won't provide backup power during an outage.

The discussion is about equipment that is designed to plug into the house wiring via an outlet, not a standalone battery that provides its own outlets. If you want to discuss an entirely different sort of equipment, then obviously the conclusions change.

This is too strong. There's a large distance between "Unwilling to tell a pollster they regret" and "Are quite happy".

I wonder if the GOP has just forgotten what decade it is with a lot of their voter suppression stuff. Yes, they're absolutely working to suppress the vote... but it really looks like most of the people they're going to stop from voting are their voters.

For a long time, the low-income and minority vote was overwhelmingly Democrat, and those same categories were also "low-propensity voters". Make voting a little bit harder and you'd reduce Democrat vote totals, while Republican voters were rich white people who were well equipped to jump whatever hoops you put up.

But there's been a realignment in politics. A lot of the low-propensity voters are now voting Republican, while the wealthy, dedicated and (especially) educated voters are now leaning strongly Democrat. Make voting harder today and you're likely to block as many Republican votes as Democrat votes... maybe more! I don't think they're going to get the return on their voter suppression that they expect.

What would democracy without capitalism look like? Democratic socialism always ends up quickly abandoning either democracy or socialism. Social democracy (e.g. the Nordic model) works pretty well, but that's still fundamentally capitalist.

You're funny. Tell me, how many under-13s do you think are on FB, despite not being allowed? Hint: All of them.

And I'll be sure to let the offshore scammers know it's illegal, I'm sure they'll be quaking in their boots.

Gotta stop you there: No, these panels and any similar plug-into-the-wall battery systems that might come with them will never be able to serve as a backup if there's a power failure. When the grid power goes out they will shut off. Even if you have both sun and full batteries, when the grid goes down, you'll lose power.

The reason was mentioned in the summary:

They also must be certified by an outside safety organization like Underwriters Laboratories and have a feature that would prevent electricity from feeding back into the grid if there's a power outage.

If they could energize your home circuitry during an outage, and your home is connected to the grid, they're also going to energize the grid. This has two consequences. One, you would actually be trying to power your whole neighborhood, not just your house, and two (and more importantly), you would be energizing the grid that power company personnel are trying to repair, which could seriously injure or kill them.

If you want to have backup during a power outage, you need another piece of equipment, a backup interface, and it needs to be inserted between your house and the grid, and to collaborate with your inverter(s). Also you inverters that with both grid-following and grid-forming modes.

During normal (grid up) operation, your inverters will synchronize to the sine wave provided by the power grid, putting power into your home (and, if you're not using it all) into the grid, in phase with the grid. When the grid goes down and your inverters see the grid wave go away they must stop putting out power, both because as a practical matter the signal they're syncing their output to has disappeared and because they must not energize a grid that is down.

When the inverters see the grid go down and stop inverting, they also send a message to the backup interface, which is just a big switch. It physically disconnects your house from the grid and then sends a message back to the inverters, telling them it's safe to form a new grid. One of them (they have to be communicating and collaborate on this) creates a new sine wave, the rest sync to it and they all start putting power into your circuits. You're in backup mode.

Note that this doesn't all happen instantaneously. It's common to have a 1-2 second outage while it all happens. I have 40 kWh of batteries on my house, but I also have small 0.15 kWh[*] UPSes on my networking equipment, desktop computer, etc., specifically to cover that small interval. Both times! Because there's a brief outage when the grid comes, back, too.

When the grid comes back, the backup interface sees it, waits a few seconds to make sure it's stable, then sends a message to the inverters: "Grid is back!". The inverters stop inverting and tell the backup interface that it's safe to reconnect to the grid. The backup interface reconnects, and the house is back on the grid. Note, though, that it's only on the grid. The inverters do not start inverting right away, even if you have plenty of sun and/or battery. Instead, they watch the grid for a minute or two to make sure it's stable, then they sync to it and begin inverting, starting by putting a small amount of power out, then ramping up until they're doing whatever they're configured to do (on my system, because I have DC-coupled batteries, they try to produce enough power to zero the grid draw/feed, allowing any excess solar to flow into the batteries until the batteries are full, then they produce enough power to zero the battery draw/feed, which pushes any excess into the grid).

[*] 150 Wh is actually way more storage than I need my UPSes to have. The problem is that AFAICT no one sells UPSes designed for situations where the UPS never has to cover more than 2-3 s of outage. When I buy a UPS I have to buy it sized by the maximum continuous wattage it can provide/relay, and it will typically come with a battery sized to provide that output for ~15 minutes, even though I only conservatively need 10 seconds.

If your home is connected to the grid, what happens in your home reaches outside of your home. In this case it's particularly obvious: If the grid is down and a lineman is working on the grid wiring near your house, he doesn't expect that wiring to be energized. If your house is backfeeding power into the grid, you could injure or kill him, even if he's a mile from your property.

So, there are regulations that limit what you can do in a grid-connected home. If you disconnect from the grid, you can do what you like (though your insurance company may still want assurances that you're following code).

Okay, I'll feed the troll: I choose to comment on Slashdot. I also choose not to use less privacy-respecting platforms like Facebook. And make no mistake, I'm under no delusion Slashdot-the-company has been anything more than yet another data harvesting endeavor since CmdrTaco sold it.

I do not have a choice in whether or not Flock misreads my license plate and I'm arrested at gunpoint as a direct result - Or worse, which will eventually happen; and Flock somehow magically bears zero liability because hey, their contract admits they're unreliable and requires users to do their own due diligence. Which absolutely none of them do.