BNE Intellinews article was taken from this press release:
https://www.icm.csic.es/en/new...
which, itself, doesn't represent the research paper accurately:
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.10...
The conclusion of the research paper is: hey, we can track these sorts of changes in the southern hemisphere and there are several possible explanations and (as with all successful research papers) more research is necessary.
Don't Look Up
Watch it again.
The Slashdot discussion from crossing 400 ppm in 2013:
https://news.slashdot.org/stor...
This year's monthly average peak so far, and a new record, was 430.51 ppm in May.
AI ethics
Vibes and snake oil
Hmmmm
In fact, the best thing to do is to use the gaps between cars to absorb speed differences so as to allow ALL traffic to flow more smoothly
I agree with you, and I find that this is easier to do in a manual because the acceleration is instantaneous. I have found that I don't have to accelerate as hard if the response is immediate, versus delayed. I don't have to brake as hard because I start slowing as soon as I back off the gas.
With most automatics, the off-pedal cruising speed is 20 to 25 mph, which means that driving any slower than that requires riding the brake. From behind, a slow, steadily moving automatic appears the same as one which is stopping, or stopped. So they create a situation in which drivers behind a steady 15mph automatic vehicle have a harder time estimating traffic speed - which leads to the inevitable traffic accordion.
Many years ago, when Motorola was in buyout talks with Google, they used Google docs extensively. One can only wonder if Google got a better deal because they were able to read Motorola's internal discussions. I don't know if they used Google docs for the discussions, but I do know there were quite a few people at the company who expressed no concern for the possibility that Google docs could leak proprietary information.
Would you rather it was efficent or effective?
âoeMake it easierâ is not a product strategy
https://uxdesign.cc/make-it-ea...
TDS isn't helpful either
One of my vehicles has an automatic transmission, and the other, a manual. The car with the automatic transmission has about twice the horsepower of the manual, but drives as if it's twice as heavy.
What I've noticed is that when driving the manual in heavy traffic, I use the brakes much less than with the automatic; one pedal both brakes and accelerates. Because I can keep the engine in its power band when crawling along in traffic, I get instant acceleration when traffic speeds up again. But with the automatic, the "delay, downshift, overaccelerate" conniption fit of the automatic transmission often allows other drivers the space to cut in front of me.
Non-systemd Debian and more and more Devuan here. This is not a high criticality vulnerability, but, after the sshd near-disaster, the second time not running systemd proves to be the right decision.
I can't hear "Debian" and "sshd" and "disaster" in the same sentence without thinking of https://research.swtch.com/ope... (the OpenSSL bug from September 2006). It really took me a minute to realize you were talking about the xz-utils attack.
So instead of teaching people to write concise, to-the-point emails, we instead let them ramble on and use AI to communicate what they really intended to say.
This doesn't solve the TLDR problem, it only makes it worse by encouraging people to waste time writing emails that others simply won't read.
Furthermore, since when is "fish" an essential food group?
The very diet this "study" claims to base its analysis on - the "Eatwell guide" - doesn't separate fish out other meats. It's basically just a reiteration of the "Mediterranean diet" from the 90's, and its true title should be "if you're middle-class in the UK and not concerned about money, but concerned about your waistline, try this."
You will be successful in your work.
