First all that have video transmission, as parking assistance, nightvision, review cameras. Infotainment. I don't think the same bus, but in the future using the same technology. One technology, one open standard might bake stuff overall easier to implement, and that lowers costs or increases quality, or features, or a mix of these.
You have any idea how much cable would be need ed in a car of today with that kind of wirering. How that would make the car a bit heavier. and how that would make the car work? I heard numbers form Volvo, moving form switches and relays to can busses made them remove about 200 kilos in the car. While adding functionality.
We are talking Ethernet BroadR here, the cabling are different. Any car design if probably still going to need multiple networks.
TCP/IP standard have nothing to do with ethernet, even if they match well. We are using TCP/IP on many other physical layers as well.
I think most automakers think about adding tcp/ip at the same time as ethernet thou. Just becase it have extra values.
The fibers are mostly, almost only used for the MOST bus, The most bus is either 25, 50 or 150 that is rought about he MBaud speed. the 25 and 150 can use fiber and the 50 and 150 uses electric contacts. I think most new cars with most uses electric connectors. At least that's the case with the newest Cadillacs. Using fibre have many problems they are expensive. For the next generations infotainment i think most, if not all automakers have been looking at using something simplar and more standard like ethernet for years. Because of the special environment i the car, it will probably be a modified ethernet. E.g. BroadR (http://www.opensig.org/). GM is part of the Open sig, prompters group, so they will probably also use this. And the starts will be in infotainment, as this need more bandwidth.
The driver, almost all accidents have to do with the driver. Getting the human out of the loop would be a better step.
No it's not strange.
First Sweden is not as liberal as you might think, we have maybe the most conservative laws against child pornography in the world, just recently a Swedish manga translator got sentenced for having child porn images. E.g. Manga images. We also need a web-filter to block out sites in the US and Japan. As both US and Japanese governments refuse to bring changes to the people behind these pages.
We classify more crimes as rape, that most other countries, what's sexual harassment in most western countries are rape in sweden.
From what i read in the swedish media including the statement by the girls, this was them having sex with Assange, they had some agreement on what was allowed in this act, Assange did this think anyhow. They both together went to the police to discuss this. The police and prosecutions decided to make a rape charge from it, based on there stories. As more info came in a higher ranked persecutor took away rape from the charge list. What really happened in the apartments of the two girls. I don't know, it's will sure be a hard to ever know for sure.
Not really, there are more limiations, some wordings in the new licence is not good, the intetions is this but that have some strange wording that implises stuff they problem didn't mean to get there. Like all creators of thridparty viewers have to follow GPL even if some make a BSD licence viewer from a different source base like libomv.
It also may limit how I as user send the gpl:ed software to an orther person. I think in practice this may wortk as intended and be little harm. even if to my reading the policy is well written.
"# You are responsible for all uses you make of Third-Party Viewers, and if you are a Developer, you are also responsible for all Third-Party Viewers that you develop or distribute."
Does that mean I as developer are resopsible for all users. as I'm resposnsible for all "Third-Party Viewers", and if some onbe just distribures and not develop?
You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish. You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tuna fish. -- from the tunefs(8) man page
