Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Who gave Paul modpoints? (Score 1) 64

I don't care what their race or sex is. I'm concerned about their age, religion, and views on war crimes and slavery.

We know Obama did war crimes because he told us about them. That's how brazen the servants of the MIC have become. (inb4 I get accused of racism this time: We know Trump does more drone strikes without due process than Obama did, because until Trump rescinded Obama's EO on reporting of such strikes, he was doing four times as many of them.)

Comment Re:Colbert is Too Openly Partisan for This (Score 1) 127

We've all seen it where openly partisan writers or directors, especially Netflix and Disney, incorporate their politics into their movies or shows and destroy their essence in the process

LOTR is about freedom vs oppression, had not just strong but powerful female characters from the get-go, and the morals are about ordinary people defeating evil by being true to their fellowship. It's woke AF from start to finish.

Comment Re:Why? Please, why? There are so many excellent . (Score 1) 127

You know full well that while it deviated from the books in some minor and a couple of major, ways (they did our boy Tom Bombadil wrong)

They only left him out, they did much worse to Faramir.

Tom Bombadil was important to the books, to give a certain feeling. But not so much to the movies, which felt epic enough without him.

Comment Re:If required, I'll delete my account/posts/comme (Score 0) 66

Which means the only way to delete the posts is to go through each one by one.
And what are the chances that a repetitive task like that is going to be seen as "bot like" behavior? 100%?

I would assume it's very high, but you could do it in a way that would be less likely to trip the detectors by adding randomness and doing it over a long period. If one starts now, one probably has plenty of time to get it done.

Comment Re:Temu missiles (Score 1) 283

This is a fallacy.

What happens is this. Someone makes a product with a 0.1% reliability. They sell it but warn it is not that high quality. Then someone says "If they are at least 10% reliable, it is worth it and buys the product.

Their is no evidence these are 10% reliable. Everything about it screams these are a new cheap, almost worthless missile. Particularly the use of the word 'hypersonic' to describe a missile that the US would never call hypersonic (we reserve that word for advanced, hard to hit hypersonic cruise missiles, not hypersonic ballistic missiles that are easy to destroy)

Slashdot Top Deals

You can write a small letter to Grandma in the filename. -- Forbes Burkowski, CS, University of Washington

Working...