Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I'm no constitutional scholar, but... (Score 1) 166

Flock is consenting to the search, and it is 'their' data. What the law hasn't really caught up to is whether people have any protection against this kind of collection. We do for bank data, health data, credit data. You can legally turn off your phone to stop its location tracking. You cannot legally drive on public roads without a compliant license plate, so it is reasonable to discuss if you have should have any protection against mass & passive collection of data you are required to display that was not meant for this purpose.

Comment Re: Murderbot seriously? (Score 1) 16

This. The tv series is OK. Maybe the second season will be better. I loved the books and (maybe it's my bias) but I didn't find the Preservationists cloying. One-dimensional, yes, but MurderBot definitely deeply cares for and about them, even though it (its preferred pronoun) is almost terminally annoyed by them; after all they are the only humans it has ever met that don't treat it like expendable property rather than the obviously sentient being that it is, and there is great humor in that. I normally don't like dystopian sci-fi much but I found the series wholly enjoyable and readily identified with the main character at every turn.

Comment Re:Murderbot seriously? (Score 4, Interesting) 16

Absolutely. These are not "serious" stories in any way. They're *clearly* written to be 100% escapist fantasy of the aromantic variety (though MurderBot is a hopeless asexual romantic) I love "hard" sci-fi (Vinge, Egan, etc.) as much as the next guy, but MurderBot is the opposite of that. Not taking itself seriously, one-dimensional characters and stupid plot points are the whole point. The TV show lost a lot of the cheesy humor in the book, which has a chuckle or two on nearly every page.

Comment Re:Murderbot seriously? (Score 4, Interesting) 16

I guess you have to have read the books? They're hokey and corny to (for me anyway) a highly-enjoyable extreme, exploring the "What does it mean to be human?" trope. I thought it was a pretty good adaptation of the first book, though IMO the best thing about the first book was MurderBot's internal monologue/dialog as it talks itself into/out of doing various things, which was somewhat lacking in the TV series format. In the subsequent books, that expands to more actual dialog between MurderBot and other characters (mainly ART initially), so that might translate better onto the screen. It might have been better if they squeezed the first two books into the first season, even if it meant sacrificing some of the action scenes, since series of novels doesn't really hit it's stride until halfway through the second book.

Comment Re:Different worlds (Score 1) 504

That's kinda nuts. I could live with the speed limit alert if it could be set to 5 over, or at least only be a flashing indicator, but the beeping was wicked distracting at times, and wow, the driver monitoring sounds really annoying to have to touch a screen every time you drive to disable it. I actually did notice that, now that I think about it, since I turned it off at one point, only to have it come back on the next time I drove, so I guess it "trained" me to not open my mouth unless I was talking, since for the most part it stopped annoying me after a couple days. That's definitely creepy.

Comment Re:Different worlds (Score 3, Interesting) 504

I just drove a Sealion myself for a week in the UK. It was overall fun to drive. Underpowered ICE, but the electric motor had some serious torque, though it seemed to limit power considerably at low speeds (might have been a setting for that somewhere) but accelerating to pass on the M roads was a dream. I didn't trust the ICC system off the M roads though. The first time I had to fight it to stay where I wanted to be, I was done with that. That said, I'd never buy one, or any other vehicle without physical buttons for climate control functions, though I might buy a second hand Seagull or one of the variants (subcompact $10,000 EV) if I could, though I would physically disable the camera pointing at my face. That shit is creepy. It would beep at me if I had my mouth open for more than like 2 seconds and tell me to take a rest, since (I guess) it thought I was yawning. Also the incessant "you're exceeding the speed limit by 2%" beeping would also definitely have to go, or it'd be a non-starter, especially since the in-dash GPS was frequently wrong about what the speed limit actually was, even in urban areas.

Comment Re:This explains the mail I just received... (Score 1) 40

Youtube Music, for me at least, would be the reason. Spotify is fine, and I paid them for their family plan for years, but YtP is only a couple bucks more and you get ad-free videos on devices that can't (easily) use an ad-blocker: e.g. the android youtube app, roku, etc, and I don't mind paying for content when it's convenient and affordable. Interestingly, I also pay for netflix, though literally none of the youtube content I watch is from "influencers" or big youtube stars, and I'm allergic to in-video-ads so I doubt very much I'll be watching any of that on netflix.

Comment Re:US created the modern rules based order (Score 2) 139

All of that is 100% objectively true, though you're missing the part where the good 'ol US of A has increasingly (since '45 and especially since '91) used military dominance, economic warfare and other covert operations as a tool to (wildly successfully) advance US interests, much like the other empires that came before it. It wasn't only good-will, trade, diplomacy and making the denizens of the "first world" rich, though that certainly all happened. Until fairly recently, virtually all citizens of the "first world" have been beneficiaries of all that to one extent or another, though currently it's almost entirely the largest corporations and the ultra-wealthy that control them that still directly benefit, though as you say, that's all going away. It will take a while for the whole world to transition away from the petrodollar and other forms of US-dominance, but it's already happening. There's no question that we (read: us-citizens and those of our "platinum-member" client states) will all be worse off for it, at least economically, including the very people that are tightening the fist to try and keep control, though it looks to me that most of the rest of the world will probably be better off once US dominance is a subject of history rather than current events, and ultimately (I hope) even though we'll be less rich in material terms, it's entirely possible that we'll be better off too in that we won't have the collective guilt and shame (how ever much suppressed) of causing so much of the suffering of the world's population just to be able to live in luxury and get away with whatever we want. In other words: we'll finally grow up.

Comment 652 on Windows 11 (Score 2) 106

Story buries the lede... 652 unpatched vulnerabilities on Windows 11 isn't really much better than 1,903 on Windows 10, since it only takes one actively exploitable vulnerability, though I realize most of those are (hopefully) not critical vulnerabilities. Course take it all with a grain of salt, since the article is basically an ad for a company selling Windows security compliance services.

I know of dozens of people still using Windows 10 (without updates) -- at this point it's probably still not really a big deal for the vast majority of people.

Comment Re:This isn't a game (Score 1) 81

Think FMLA such as childbirth, or military-related absence. You aren't allowed to to fire someone for taking that leave*, nor can you fire them because their 'clicks per hour' metric for the quarter was low *because* they took that leave.

* There are qualifications on if the law applies to your business and if the person themselves qualifies, but here I assume all those are met

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1) 216

One doesn't "just" build a significant power plant; quick search says 2-5 years. Even then you have the problem of transmission infrastructure struggling to get the power to the right places.

* If you think people NIMBY a datacenter, power plants are worse.
* Lead time to permit and build a plant is nontrivial.
* Installing a new rail line or pipeline to get fuel to the plant is slow.

Now, market forces will tend to incentivize more power plant builds if there are economic gains to be had. However a new plant is not suddenly going to cause a reduction in prices -- have to pay off the plant.

Further, the power operators are possibly looking at the prospect of an 'ai bubble' such that they don't want to commit to 10 years of paying off new plants if the datacenters fail to materialize.

Comment Robots shmobots. (Score 1) 321

The only winning move (for either side) is the same as it was years ago: sincere diplomacy that works toward a permanent peace. The alternative is (essentially) a war of attrition, unless NATO is going to send a million troops to the front along with huge amounts of firepower, and if NATO was going to do that, it would have happened years ago. I suppose there is another alternative that is "unthinkable", but it's definitely there... *sigh*

Comment Re:Will it catch the president? (Score 1) 43

But they do. Congresspeople from both parties who sit in closed door committees regularly engage in trading in the very industries they're (ostensibly) regulating. They've publicly admitted as much, and have said "So what, big deal. We have the right to make investments." So the issue isn't *catching* them, it's completely changing the system so that they can't do it as a "matter of course" with total impunity, and (I'm not holding my breath) holding the POTUS and other high-level officials to that same standard when it comes to trading immediately before/after geopolitical/military maneuvers.

If they then want to play games with blind trusts and sharing inside information with the people in charge of those trusts, they're free to commit crimes, like anyone else, if they think they're worth the risk, but if the SEC and other bodies actually had any power (or at least willingness) to hold them accountable, I'd imagine they'd at least think twice. I think most of them probably don't even see what they're doing as criminal. In their minds, they're just using their privileged positions to "strategic advantage". In a much less insane world, such actions would be *easily* traceable and would, at worst, result in public disgrace for those involved, and at best, doing hard time.

I realize that this may (at this point at least) be a pipe dream, since the whole bloody thing is stacked in favor of the people making the rules. It's always been that way, but nowadays it's approaching totality.

Slashdot Top Deals

The system was down for backups from 5am to 10am last Saturday.

Working...