Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Can't wait to try out Home Assistant when I can... (Score 3, Informative) 32

.. Google Home has been nerfed in so many ways over the past few years, it's almost useless now save for turning my lights on and off.

- They killed the Apps SDK, and all games and custom stuff
- They killed Google Music, and 'play X from my Library", only Youtube Premium Music now or ads in between every damn track
- They killed all podcast feeds other than Youtube Music (many podcasts aren't on Youtube).
- They have borked most radio stations (used to be able to play almost any station via TuneIn)

The Enshittification has been wide, deep and purposeful. No way in hell will I *ever* pay for Youtube Premium.

Comment Gates is a hypocrite. Dumpster diving BASIC (Score 2) 82

...source code for the version his local university had, their listings were often discarded in the back bins of the labs. Oh, and he wasn't enrolled in classes there so he stole computer lab time to work on his version.

No I don't have the references handy, but they're out there.

Comment Re:Asus made phones? Tip: Never ASUS, stay away. (Score 1) 27

I liked my ZenPhone 2 Laser back around 2018-2019, for a while.. but the camera was sluggish as all hell, and the ZenPhone 3 was, I'm told, even worse. ASUS did absolute dick all to improve the situation, despite the fact their forum was absolutely full of users complaining about camera issues.

And, idiot that I am, back in 2024 I bought an ASUS laptop (Duo Pro 2024) -- dual-screen beauty of engineering, but, you guessed it, ZERO support for issues and they pretend Linux doesn't even exist.

It's been about 2 years and keyboard, screen and audio support for Linux are still entirely absent save for some heroic independent devs who are trying to make things work (they're still not done reverse-engineering ASUS's bullshit).

Never buy ASUS, ever. They hate open hardware, and hate users.

Comment Was this brute-force collation or really 'solving' (Score 1) 113

I admit I'm sour on LLMs, esp. in math. It could be though, that by brute-force searching for related topics and data, it brought enough info together to propose something and this time, it happened to be right or nearly-right enough for the researcher to have a light-bulb go off, so to speak.

I fully admit I didn't RTFA (read the fine article) -- I'm supposed to be working right now. But given how often LLMs get things entirely, completely, but confidently wrong, I still must presume this was the rare exception, not proof of some new step in "AI".

Comment Re:Old man yells at chatbot in the cloud... (Score 4, Interesting) 54

Oh no, he is *definitely* angry about the spam... the vast energy wasted in generating it, the insincerity-by-proxy of the AI tech-bros who tasked it with generating this email ... so many aspects are just dumb and wasteful and rude. His reply should be a beacon and example to everyone else on how to treat this slop, the systems that generate it, and the tech execs who fostered it for their own selfish gain.

Guillotines cannot come soon enough for these bunker-building post-capitalist corporatist arseholes.

Open Source

OpenAI Joins the Linux Foundation's New Agentic AI Foundation (nerds.xyz) 18

OpenAI, alongside Anthropic and Block, have launched the Agentic AI Foundation under the Linux Foundation, describing it as a neutral home for standards as agentic systems move into real production. It may sound well-meaning, but Slashdot reader and NERDS.xyz founder BrianFagioli isn't buying the narrative. In a report for NERDS.xyz, Fagioli writes: Instead of opening models, training data, or anything that would meaningfully shift power toward the community, the companies involved are donating lightweight artifacts like AGENTS.md, MCP, and goose. They're useful, but they're also the safest, least threatening pieces of their ecosystem to "open." From where I sit, it looks like a strategic attempt to lock in influence over emerging standards before truly open projects get a chance to define the space. I see the entire move as smoke and mirrors.

With regulators paying closer attention and developer trust slipping, creating a Linux Foundation directed fund gives these companies convenient cover to say they're being transparent and collaborative. But nothing about this structure forces them to share anything substantial, and nothing about it changes the closed nature of their core technology. To me, it looks like Big Tech trying to set the rules of the game early, using the language of openness without actually embracing it. Slashdot readers have seen this pattern before, and this one feels no different.

Slashdot Top Deals

Oh, so there you are!

Working...