> whereas normally you'd have to wait for the harm to happen to sue

False. You can file a suit for any reason at any time. You do not have to wait until any harm is done. This does not, of course, mean the judge has to accept your filing.

But in this case, the 'harm' is that they are slowing down development/improvement of a product you are paying for. If you buy into a service on the promise or reasonable expectation that the vendor of that service will continue to improve it, and then they declare that they will drag their feet, that's a type of harm because you're not getting what you reasonably expected to be getting for your money.

Ultimately it's up to the judge to decide if there's enough meat on that bone to proceed to the next phase, but it's enough to get the paperwork started.
=Smidge=

Stop cut and pasting AI slop you moron, it doesnt make you look smart. We re quite capable of quizzing an LLM ourselves.

So stalking is constitutional, then?

'cause it's not just "recording in public" it's full tracking and profiling. Who you are, where you are, when you're there. A full record of your daily activities from the moment you walk out your front door to the moment you get home again.

If the government was doing this directly in the same manner as these corporations do (e.g. without a warrant) it would 100% be a violation of your constitutional rights. The fact that the government does it by proxy, letting a private corporation do all the dirty work for them, really does not change the fundamental complaint here.

=Smidge=

Frameworks have nothing to do with OO. Ask any javascript kiddie. And if you want to babble about "how computers really work" I presume you're programming them using front console toggle switches and an enter button? No? Didn't think so.

"I've worked on were big and complex mainly"

yeah, sure you have.

"you're a just noob that needs more experience before spouting your theories."

Son, I started out with punched cards. I was probably programming before your parents had even met so spare me your faux guru BS. You really need to go get a clue. OO makes a number of problems simple, so does declarative programming. Horses for courses. When you've got some actual experience instead of playing with you PC in your bedroom you might realise that.

Says someone who's never worked on a big system with complex data.

That's why most C devs migrated to C++. Remind us about Rusts object model... oh that's right , it doesnt have one. Like VB it has kinda sorta OO type stuff but theres actual OO there. And yes, it does matter. Procedural programming large code based becomes a chore real fast.

"The game is up" is a common turn of phrase you aspie idiot. Normal people know exactly what he means.

“The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco”

Thanks for the heads up, I never thought of searching for the info. Been there, done that, I still don't understand whats going on on a large scale inside these models.

... I know how my parents felt when I tried to explain programming too them. It all makes grammatical sense but the actual meaning eludes me.

Is it just me? Am I just getting old and heading for the get-off-my-lawn stage or are there any other people who like to think they're tech savvy but are totally confused by AI models and how they really work?

From what I can gather, superionic means the O2 is frozen in a lattice while the H2 moves around within in. Doesn't this just mean the water/ice has dissociated into solid oxygen with hydrogen diffused inside?

Doesn't seem that much to me at all given how much iron can expand and contract per degrees C as it heats and cools. 14 miles out of 3000 is 0.5% which is nothing.

CO2 being an infra red absorber and scatterer really isn't hard to understand for anyone with even a passing understanding of physics. ie not you.

There are methods to add noise patterns to audio that are imperceptible to humans but cause AI to go apeshit, such as misidentifying rock music as classical or transcribing speech as something completely different from what is said.

I wonder what the practicalities might be to deploy this form of attack in an area around you when having a conversation you with to keep private. Probably would not be inaudible when played through a speaker (unlike data implanted in audio recordings) but maybe masked? Listen to some music on your phone's loudspeaker at a modest volume and broadcast invisible noise that fills any eavesdropping AI's buffer with junk or even malicious payloads.
=Smidge=

"but weather changes are so significant that our prediction models dont work anymore"

AI weather models may use the past to predict the future but AFAIK conventional models simply use physics so climate change will be factored in by default by dint of registering higher temps at monitoring stations.