Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Chuck Norris stayed active until his final days (Score 4, Informative) 160

IMO: this would be so much better than being bedridden, or needing constant care. He was active and in good spirits until his final days.

Google AI Overview:

According to reports from March 20, 2026, legendary actor and martial artist Chuck Norris died at age 86,remaining active and training until his final days. Only 10 days before his death, he shared a video of himself sparring on his 86th birthday, demonstrating his continued fitness and dedication to martial arts.

Key Details Regarding His Final Activities:

- Final Training: Even with his recent health issues before passing, Norris was reported to be in good spirits, training and staying active up until his last week.

- Birthday Post: On March 10, 2026, he posted a video on social media celebrating his 86th birthday with training exercises, saying he was "leveling up" rather than just aging.

- Lasting Legacy: Throughout his later years, he continued to engage with fans and maintain his physical health, ensuring he remained active.

Comment Re:Voters are dumb. (Score 1) 120

The only thing that article says about it is that the local government did a study and concluded that it wasn't an environmental hazard.

Think about it this way: why would a gas turbine mounted on a trailer emit more pollution than a fixed facility? It's burning the same fuel, with the same emissions controls.

Comment Re:Voters are dumb. (Score 0, Flamebait) 120

Mobile generators don't produce any more pollution than regular power plants. It is common for businesses to install mobile generators so that they can operate them right away (I believe the law allows them to operate for 1 year) before they get permanent air permits for them. By the way, Xai does have stationary permits for them now, so even that deeply flawed information is out of date.

It is hilarious to see morons like you vacillate between claiming these companies are irresponsible for using the grid without paying for new generation, and complaining when they do add the grid capacity to cover their use. It couldn't be more obvious that it has triggered a knee-jerk anti-development instinct in your lizard brain and that you have not capacity whatsoever to consider these developments rationally.

All this anti-datacenter nonsense is entirely unfounded in reality, so you are just another one of the stupid voters I am talking about.

Comment Re:Voters are dumb. (Score -1, Troll) 120

Actually, the concerns are not real either. These don't really use all that much power, and they don't use any water or pollute the environment at all to speak of. Adding capacity to the grid to power these data centers should be entirely trivial. It's not because of other dumb rules that other dumb voters have supported in the past. Any attempt to solve the problem by limiting new development is completely nonsensical.

Slashdot Top Deals

One person's error is another person's data.

Working...