Except this wouldn't actually solve this. You'd be able to share the business logic, which would be a benefit. But you wouldn't be able to share any of the UI, system, or OS interaction code which is where all the incompatibilities come. If you just wanted to share business logic, there were already ways you could do that (write it in C would be one way).
Also, if they really wanted to do that, they should consider going the opposite way and bringing Kotlin to Swift. Kotlin also has a significant server side use that's growing (mainly by replacing Java), Swift is iOS and Mac only. They'll find a lot more people willing to learn Kotlin than Swift. Of course Apple won't consider that due to NIH and control issues.
I was a prior fortune 50 executive working at the C level for a publicly traded company, and these leeches were the biggest Problem I
Wow amazing, that was also my experience when I was working as a CEO of a fortune 50 executive at a publicly traded company!
I got better.
In other words, it can do the things a normal human being can do after reading a book.
Humans and machines are not treated the same under copyright law. They are different, and the law treats them differently.
As an impartial outsider to this discussion
I appreciate that you are an outsider, but you should admit you are in no way impartial.
I'm not really sure what you mean here - the "problem" of multiple human generations taking antibiotics?
It's the kind of thing antivaxxers complain about with regards to vaccines, no one has done a study to determine how the covid vaccine affects people over multiple generations or something like that. No one says that about oral medicine.
"Right now I feel that I've got my feet on the ground as far as my head is concerned." -- Baseball pitcher Bo Belinsky