Some people put a lot of work into curating their slop feed.

Manuals are great if you know the API you want to call and need to know the details. They aren't good if you don't know the API, or even if one exists. Or if the problem you're debugging is more complex than just "passed the wrong parameter to this function".

Because 1984 was just copying what people were already doing.

Can we start a whisper campaign to discredit Facebook?

Before I make an argument, I want to know if you have the intellect to understand it. That's why I asked if you'd read the paper or not.

You're talking about someone else's goalposts, not mine. I can't think of a real scenario where space data centers are cheaper than land data centers.

Maybe or maybe not, but it's actively under construction.

Orbital data centers interfere with space bats and weightless warblers. You can't win.

Did you actually read the paper, or did you watch a movie made by someone who pretended to read the paper?

Datacenters in space are to support Golden Dome. Google is working for the US military. It's not about price.

Ironic daisies, data centers in space are planned as part of the nuclear Golden Dome. Google is working for the US military.

Data centers in space are a thing to help support the Golden Dome. Gotta be able to recognize a missile launch. Google is working for the US military.

Amazingly better than the one output by the LLM.

Other companies have launched data centers, and definitely are thinking of cooling. You can see the size of the solar panels and heat sink.

Hopefully not, since Starfield has already launched data centers with arguably a better design.

The reason for having data centers in space is because Golden Dome requires AI in space, presumably for target recognition. Google is working for the US military.

If there were something better than Cisco, then Cisco would buy them.

Damn the numbers in that list make me want to start a hardware company.