No matter how much you oppress people if they're starving to death they will act against you.
Then why is the Kim family still in power in North Korea?
You don't get to create and then destroy life just to prolong yours.
That's what you do every time you eat. Are you monstrous?
It is a monstrous suggestion.
Only Jainism opposes it.
Something like this needs density. If there's not enough people using it, then the per use cost will be far too much to make it economically viable. That makes cities much more attractive to startups like this. Of course there you have airspace issues with large buildings, so the true sweet spot may be relatively dense but very high income suburbs. But it sure as heck won't be rural.
People probably made the same argument for the horse when the car was invented: "A horse requires no fuel. What if someone attacks you and the car runs out of fuel?"
I would be very surprised if someone had that argument when the car was invented. You're really stretching for this one.
The attack lasted around six minutes...San Francisco police officers showed up shortly after.
We've been using energy policy to hurt Cuba for decades.
I don't mind sanctions. Any country that doesn't have free elections is a country we shouldn't be trading with.
Governments should not keep their people as slaves.
My idea of roughing it turning the air conditioner too low.