Linus Torvalds has gone on record saying that Tivoization is OK. I don't see how he can rant against bootloader locking without backtracking on that stance.

Public interest would have been higher if they had picked a more appropriate name, like Googly Eyes.

Furthermore, the examples are probably not a representative sample of the output. Humans probably picked a few good ones out of a set of mediocre ones.

It is now known that sunlight exposure leads to the production of nitric oxide, which is important in blood pressure regulation. The health benefits of nitric oxide are independent of Vitamin D, and in fact may outweigh the risk of skin cancer.

So many service attendants standing around! You would think that one of them could wash your windows while you wait for the battery swap.

The summary is missing the important qualifier "... unless the person may be in danger". So, apparent abductions and unexplained disappearances would still get police assistance like you would expect.

What he means is, "The UK can raise its tax rate all it wants. It makes no difference to Google, since we will structure our business deals so that they are not subject to UK tax anyway."

On the other hand, if your house uses electric heaters, you could mine Bitcoins in the winter with no additional waste of energy. You might as well get some computation out of your electricity before it turns into heat.

Write once, run anywhere.

If Steve Jobs weren't dead already, he would be so regretful of the fact that he could have produced a phone with no button on the front.

999 is easy to pocket-dial. It was good for the days of rotary-dial phones, but not so good for keypads in a pocket.

Pirate Parties have recently started to become a considerable political force in northern Europe. Do you support them? Could you suggest a better name for them? What advice would you have for their political strategy?

Mr. Stallman, thank you for all the hard work you have done to promote computing freedom. I know that many people consider your views to be excessively dogmatic, but more often than not, your ideas and predictions turn out to be correct. Thank you for steadfastly holding to your principles while most people opt for convenience, as you have made the world a better place.

It appears to me that Apple, of all companies, has ironically played the biggest role in ending the use of DRM in the music download industry. As I see it, the music companies were so afraid of Apple's rise in market share that they decided to sell everything DRM-free rather than let Apple control the distribution channel with its FairPlay scheme. As a result, it is now the norm that music tracks purchased online are unencrypted and carry at most a watermark.

I acknowledge that Apple is horribly hostile to computing freedom in so many ways. It's therefore ironic that their dominance with the iTunes Music Store has led to the end of DRM in the music download industry, purely through capitalistic means and without preaching or legislation. My question, then, is this: Could it be possible to promote computing freedom by gaming the market (playing companies off each other) rather than preaching on a soapbox?

If air travel becomes more expensive, alternatives like teleconferencing become more attractive. Leisure travelers may choose closer destinations or skip vacations altogether. People can also choose other modes of transport, which in the U.S. usually means driving.

Southern Italy: where toxic waste is reclassified and dispersed in random places in the countryside.