Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Sound familiar? (Score 1) 243

Maybe you can't charge people to listen to it, but you can legally charge people to rent the CD from you.

Not in the USA.

See 17 U.S.C. Â109(b)(1)(A)

Also, if I grab random people off the street and ask them if the want to come to my house to listen to the latest insert artist name here CD, it's perfectly legal. Even though once I get enough people, they are a crowd, and they are strangers, it's not a public performance.

The operative term here is "my house." Do it basically anywhere besides that and it is a public performance.

Comment Re:Sound familiar? (Score 1) 243

You can haul as many strangers around in your Honda as you want and charge them as much money as you can convince them to pay for the privilege. You can't legally charge anyone to listen to your CD and you certainly can't play it for a crowd of strangers even if they don't pay you a dime.

Comment Re:No damage? (Score 4, Insightful) 214

There seems to be this common misconception that a network can be broken into without causing any damage. Tell that to the IT department that has to re-flash and re-image every damn machine on the network to make sure no backdoors were left behind.

Those actions and associated costs are not the result of having your network broken into. They are the result of being told your network is vulnerable - even if you have no knowledge that the network was actually broken into.

Comment Re:Next - SE for houses without security systems (Score 0) 85

So by that logic, I assume you rape every woman you pass on a dark street, mug the elderly who don't go out in groups, and commit every other crime of opportunity to shame people into what *you* consider proper, minimum safe behavior. How brave and noble of you.

Yes, in fact I make suire to rape and mug every chance I get!!

The fact that you have to make such an absurd argument ought to be a clue that you have misunderstood the original point.

Comment Re:Industrial revolution standard procedure (Score 1) 174

To you, "education" doesn't means people who are educated to do tasks, such as engineers, teachers and so on. It means being indoctrinated to think the way you do.

Really? That is such baloney. Total cop-out. Education means an increase in knowledge and skills and that universally means more than just technical school.

Because there are numerically more educated (as in high education) people in China now then in any other country in the world.

And yet as a proportion of the population, they are still quite small and quite new. You don't get political change until you get at least a sizable minority interested in change. Come back in 2 generations and you will be eating crow, and I don't mean chicken feet.

Comment Re:Next - SE for houses without security systems (Score 3, Insightful) 85

Well, at least one difference is that when a website gets hacked it is almost always the people visiting the website who are the target because the goal of the hacker is either to grab information about those users from the hacked system or to use the hacked system to distribute exploits to anyone that browses there.

While when a house is broken into, it is basically a problem for the owners of the house and not really anyone else.

So publishing a list of vulnerabilities on websites serves the purpose of shaming the website operators into better protecting their users.

Comment Re:Industrial revolution standard procedure (Score 1) 174

1. Not "overborrowing" but "borrowing". In general. Chinese SAVE money.

Still not applicable to the topic at hand.

2. These laws are not seen as important even when they are enacted. Locals simply do not care for them.

Ah, now at least you have a relevant point. I disagree though. I'd say that sort of problem goes away as the general population becomes more educated. When everybody is a starving, illiterate peasant then there isn't much ability to take a larger view. Fortunately, most of the people affected are no longer starving and education has become exceptionally important in China over the last decade+. Even if it is more of a technical nature than most western educations it is still a huge step forward in the average citizen's ability to comprehend cause and effect and their place in the larger world. I don't expect change to happen over night (it didn't happen overnight in the west either), at a minimum the majority of the last generation still has to die off or otherwise get out of the way.

Comment Re:Industrial revolution standard procedure (Score 1) 174

And take it from somebody living in Shanghai at the moment. A woman was run over by a taxi driver because nobody respects the traffic lights for people on foot. Do you think the cars stopped when they saw her motionless body on the street? They just started to drive around it.

Do you understand that that sort of callusness was not uncommon in the US during the industrial revolution? Don't make the mistake of assuming that being on different places on a developmental timeline means that they are headed in a different direction.

Comment Re:Industrial revolution standard procedure (Score 1) 174

1. Chinese value saving money for future and living frugally. US residents value borrowing money to reach higher level of life.

You seem ignorant to the fact that this over-borrowing in US culture is new in the last 35 years or so. Certainly was not the case during tthe industrial revolution. And I still don't see what that has to do with legislative fixes to problems brought on by the industrial revolution.

2. Chinese do not value individual life but they value groups, clans and family ties. US residents value individuality to a far greater degree.

So what does that have to do with laws like cleaning up the environment, food quality laws, and labor laws like safe working conditions?

Let me give you a few more then, at which point you will perhaps stop being obtuse.

No, I am afraid it is you who is being obtuse. You are so convinced of the correctness of your argument, that you can't make your argument in a convincing fashion.

Comment Re:Industrial revolution standard procedure (Score 1) 174

They are relevant in the simple point that their very basic values, such as "who is more valuable, daughter or mother" are vastly different.

So what? Really, you are claiming something is self-evident and I don't see it. I see a minor difference in the valuation of family members, but it is still the valuing of family.

Comment Re:Good News (Score 1) 224

Yes, six-strikes is basically the MAFIAA's gift to the VPN industry and the "web locker" industry.

I've been looking at VPNs for a while, but I haven't found one that hits all of my requirements. Maybe people here can make some recommendations.

1) At least 3 devices - my home router and the smartphones of me and the wife. I'd really like to see 5 devices just so I've got enough of slop that I don't have to worry about keeping track of what is VPNed and what is not.

2) High throughput

3) Multiple egress points in multiple countries

4) Unlimited switching between egress points

5) Good pricing

6) Reliable - not some fly-by-night looking to cash in on the MAFIAA's indulgence

Slashdot Top Deals

A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation.