Nowhere in there was anything actually showing any incorrect math.

It's like you think we can't see your post history.

The place for a union is any place someone is paid for work.

that is absolute BS.

so why do you keep posting the same drivel?

2 years later, you're still posting the same wrong things.

(you cant hide it with your sock puppets)

that is blatantly false.
solar has already shown itself capable of powering entire nations.

a solar grid ~140 miles on a side could power the globe.
not useful in a literal sense, but gives a starting point of the amount of surface area required.
as it is, every residential roof in the US alone would provide that much area.
add in commercial buildings, which are less likely to have suboptimal roof lines and angles (being typically flat), and the rest of the world, and you've taken into account the need for more than that minimum area (cause the earth spins you know).

and while a "smart grid" would help greatly in distribution, it's not required.

meaning the problem is solvable.
today.
with current technology.
and without all the downsides of nuclear.

the only thing lacking is the political and human will to make it happen.

that is blatantly false.
solar has already shown itself capable of powering entire nations.

a solar grid ~140 miles on a side could power the globe.
not useful in a literal sense, but gives a starting point of the amount of surface area required.
as it is, every residential roof in the US alone would provide that much area.
add in commercial buildings, which are less likely to have suboptimal roof lines and angles (being typically flat), and the rest of the world, and you've taken into account the need for more than that minimum area (cause the earth spins you know).

and while a "smart grid" would help greatly in distribution, it's not required.

meaning the problem is solvable.
today.
with current technology.
and without all the downsides of nuclear.

the only thing lacking is the political and human will to make it happen.

Not if its cross-linked with a redundant melacortz ramistat.

Still needs word and character count

Not flame bait.
Mod up, +1 Fact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Translation:
when judges agree with me: good decision
when they don't: ACTIVIST JUDGES MAKING LAWS!

usual denialist talking points.

Not this fast; the delineation between natural change and what we're seeing is readily apparent.

False.

A) Sun: False. We are currently in a solar minimum. If the sun were driving it we would be cooling
B) Volcanoes: False. Volcanoes only emit ~ 300 million tonnes of CO2 per year, LESS THAN 1% of what humans emit per year (which is in excess of 40 billion tonnes annually).
C) The implication that we don't know everything that goes into climate: False.

I will state it clearly: Human activity is the primary driver of current changes in climate we see. This is indisputable.

Irrelevant because (a) the current biosphere of life did not exist at those times. Current life evolved for current changes over the extremely long terms that
(b) Those changes occurred over.

he never has sources.
just claims.