Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I'm getting tired of this industry (Score 1) 75

I've spent about half my 30-year career as an employee and half as a contractor (which I am now). When you count benefits and everything else, the difference in net cost to the client isn't as much as you'd think. The advantage to the client is disposability. While it may look like companies fire their employees as easily as they throw out their cafeteria trash, there's more overhead involved in getting rid of an employee (even without tenure, collective bargaining,etc.) and WAY more when hiring an employee than when renting and returning a contractor.

Speaking of net, my net income as a contractor (full-time, on-site) is not a whole lot different from the equivalent employee position. (YMMV, especially if you're an H1-B.) Of course, I bill short-term work much, much higher, but that's because there's less of it. I prefer the (very relative) stability of being on a full-time PSA versus billing a couple hours a week from a dozen different clients.

Comment Re:I'm getting tired of this industry (Score 2) 75

I'd be delighted if one of my kids told me he or she wanted to be an electrician. There will always be a demand, there are fun toys and interesting tech to play with, there are physical things you can look at and say, "I built that!", and unlike plumbers, you don't often deal with raw sewage.

You don't get vilified as lazy and overpaid by the lumpen like teachers, or publish-or-perish while bowing and scraping for grant money like professors. You're not in college and beyond until your late 20s or longer, like doctors, not to mention the insane student loan debt and crushing malpractice premiums.

And, you're not subject to the whims of either the stock market or PHBs or drunken executives the way we in the corporate world are.

Comment Re:BARRIER!? (Score 2) 166

I pay cash for my cars because of three things: 1. I don't buy extravagant cars; the last new ones were between $25K-$30K and the last used ones were half that; 2. As soon as I buy a car I start saving for the next one; 3. A windfall in the 1999-2000 dot-com boom gave me the initial large chunk of cash to start doing this (among other things).

I could have done the same thing even if that windfall had never come, but it would have meant less money into my 401(k).

All this presumed enough income that I actually could save some of it. Not everyone has that, many live paycheck-to-paycheck, and very few have enough to save for cars *and* max out their 401(k), and save for kids' college, and keep some money liquid, etc. I've been very fortunate.

Submission + - Lowell Observatory pushes to name an asteroid "Travyon" (azdailysun.com)

Flash Modin writes: The observatory where Pluto was discovered is pushing to name an asteroid after a black teenager killed in a controversial confrontation in Florida last year.

William Lowell Putnam III says his family is identified with the cause of African American rights, and thus an asteroid named after Trayvon Martin is perfectly appropriate. Putnam is the sole trustee of the observatory, which was founded by Percival Lowell during his search for canals on Mars.

Astronomers at the observatory discovered the asteroid in 2000, but it has not been formally named.

Putnam has already asked the Minor Planet Center once to designate the asteroid "Trayvon," but they told him the designation was "premature." Now that there's been a verdict, the observatory is reapplying in hopes the naming body will see things different.

Submission + - FTC Issues Warning About Buggy, Insecure Home Surveillance Gear (securityledger.com)

chicksdaddy writes: The Security Ledger reports that U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Wednesday made one of its strongest statements to date on the issue of consumer privacy in the fast-emerging market for “smart” electronics: settling a complaint with the maker of SecurView, a line of home surveillance cameras that, it turns out, were just as easily used to spy into the homes of SecurView customers.

In a statement (http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2013/09/trendnet.shtm), the FTC said that it settled a complaint against TRENDnet, which markets and sells SecurView. The FTC had charged the Torrance, California company with misrepresenting the security of its products and selling “faulty software that left (the cameras) open to online viewing” by anyone who knew the device’s IP address.

The complaint stems from a February, 2012 case in which the web site Console Cowboys published details (http://console-cowboys.blogspot.com/2012/01/trendnet-cameras-i-always-feel-like.html) on how a firmware flaw allowed authentication for Internet-connected SecurView cameras to be bypassed, giving any Internet user (with the know-how) the ability to view the surveillance camera’s live feed.

But the agency went beyond that, warning in its statement and accompanying blog posts that the problem of shoddy and insecure software extended beyond TrendNet.

"The Internet of Things holds great promise for innovative consumer products and services. But consumer privacy and security must remain a priority as companies develop more devices that connect to the Internet,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez in a statement.

Slashdot Top Deals

Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.

Working...