Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Comment I read the article (Score 3, Insightful) 536

And I must say that as the Editor in Chief he has a very simplistic view of the problem. If I understand, his view is that a global exception added at the compiler level would somehow solve all the problems. He gives the example of calling "open" without worrying about it failing. Of course he doesn't state how to handle the failure when it occurs. For example

open(file1); // ok
open(file2); // failure

What happens to file1 in this case? How is the code cleaned up? There may be a case where you don't want to just close all files in the functions, but just create file2 if the open failed. (for example).

His complaint is that there is too many options available for error handling, and that they lead to cluttered code. As far as I can see the alternative is not enough options available and code not always doing what you want, and having to fight the compiler in order to get what you want.

Slashdot Top Deals

Many people write memos to tell you they have nothing to say.