And then the UK has immoral laws that don't put people on the hook for becoming knowledgeable about the consequences of their actions.
I don't think you understand JonnyCalcutta's comment. If there is serious negligence or risk then it is manslaughter. If it is something like someone getting confused at a junction, someone runs out into the road at a moment when the driver is distracted by aircraft noise, or someone from a country that usually drives on the right turning into the wrong lane when coming out of a US airforce base, etc. it is death by dangerous driving.
Bank of Russia Calls for Full Ban on Crypto
I'm not using their home banking wabsite then!
The adult class was challenging — you had to really want to learn to code in order to stay engaged.
If you make mistakes in your code, it just doesn't do anything. But when it works, there's not much pay-off — just some lines on a screen.
and
I also found the step change from learning Scratch [a Children's programming language] to Python similarly jarring in the children's toys — you suddenly go from colourful blocks to an empty screen with no handholding.
So, what could help bridge this gap from fun games for kids, to more professional level complex coding?
For most programmers the payback is what is happening; your program might just print one number, for example the nth factorial or prime. I don't see this as a man/woman thing, just a way of looking at things, I work with a female programmer who is quite happy to work on back-end systems that only produce a line of JSON as output or even only change database entries.
Is this idea that there should be a course that will teach any woman (or man) to be a productive programmer wrong? Or am I looking only at a certain type of programmer, and people who value pretty feedback over getting processes working could pursue a career as developers?
Groups like the ADL, AJC, WJC, and virtually any other Jewish group is behind these moves. They simply can't afford to have the goyim figure things out.
80 years ago the Germans would have been very receptive to your message. They learned the hard way.
they are probably using the total usage of an average household for its claim (as everyone does)
That seems to fit. From Uksave: How much energy does the average UK household consume?
According to Ofgem, the average household in the UK has 2.4 people living in it, and uses 2,900 kWh of electricity...
Danish energy firm Orsted has said... it will use 165 turbines from Siemens Gamesa
What?
One would think, but it sounds like the car always checks to see if it's ok to remote start by connecting to an internet service,
So remote start doesn't work if you can't get a phone data signal?
the time you save commuting will be spent working from home 10-12 hours a day.
Stuff that, when my day finishes my day finishes. I have a work and personal mobile with different numbers, and whereas my manager does have my personal number she does know that it is for emergencies only - the only time she used it was a text asking if I could start an online meeting first thing next day as she had to miss it.
So what?
I'm vaccinated and boosted. Wear a mask at work. At this point, I value the social interaction and sense of normalcy more than I value a 0% chance of getting COVID. If I get it, it is what it is.
But I'm working with mostly-vaccinated people in a city that has a 90% adult vaccination rate, so I'm not too worried. I'm done with being stuck at home.
What we don't know yet, but should do in the next few weeks, is the death rate for omicron in those who are vaccinated. We already know that the infection rate is high among those who have been double vaccinated with half of hospital admissions in the UK now being people who have had the two jabs. Until we know that I'm working from home, though I admit it's easy for me as I enjoy it; an hour and a half each day not spent commuting plus I can walk my dogs in the countryside in my lunch break. I know people living in city-centre apartments who find it very difficult.
Function reject.