Uighur probably.

They can't ultimately prevent lay-offs but they can help ensure that those who are laid off are not selected unfairly, and will be likely to have negotiated reasonable redundancy terms. By knowing that anyone who thinks they have been made redundant unfairly will have free (as in already paid for through subscriptions) access to union lawyers, companies are likely to ensure that selection is fair and only those who are genuinely redundant are let go.

I used to have a boss who was a problem gambler. I can guarantee that if he was told to stop he'd be straight down to the next casino, or bookies, or failing that a gambling machine in a pub. The only way he stopped was to cut off his source, which he could only do because he had the support of his wife who went to the bank with him, arranged to have all his credit removed, his wages paid into her account and then gave him a daily allowance for food and petrol. Even then he ran out of petrol once because he'd gambled the money away.

That's fine with me

You only say "unfortunately" because you are not a mouse!

Pump storage will probably play a part too, though I don't know how much of Germany has the right geography.

While nobody is looking Britain might take America back!

They may be trying to protect Western Europe, though the motivation would be to avoid the West entering the conflict. It looks extremely unlikely that the west will offer any direct military support to Ukraine. One thing that would make intervention a lot more likely is if the Russians were seen to either deliberately or through incompetence allow another reactor to melt down, again spreading radioactive fallout across Europe. The Ukrainians must have thought about false flag attacks, hopefully dismissing anything so radical, but Russia must consider this possibility. So maybe they are taking control to avoid the situation.

Boris Johnson has asked Jacob Rees Mog to look for opportunities. He has recommended saving Ukraine by sending in the Light Brigade.

Even (maybe especially) if you were paid you could be found negligent of fraudulent of misrepresenting the company to clients. If they proved that you knew that there were fake employees and profiles and passed this off as true to clients you would certainly be in trouble.

I believe only in the instance of clear serious error. You get paid £3,000,000 one month instead of £3.000 they can reverse it provided it does not take you overdrawn. They say that you should have been paid £2.990 but they dispute a claim for a parking ticket, this is not a clear error rather a dispute and they'd leave it for the company to sort out with you.

If I want to talk investments I talk investments. If I want to look at a tiger I look at a tiger. I see no advantage in mixing the two

How about six years confined to Facebook - no other sites allowed? That would teach them

Is this the start of subscription based CPUs - so like many other things you have to keep paying to use what you purchased?

Just because they had more sensitive noses doesn't mean they perceived body odour as bad. My dogs have a much more keen sense of smell than me but if I come back from a run they sniff me wagging their tails. When I come out of the shower they sniff from a distance and look disapproving!